| TREASURY AND RISK MANAGEMENT |
July/ August
1999 |
WHEN CORPORATES CHARGE
Bausch & Lomb turns to purchasing
cards to help pare transactions costs in Asia.
By David Lake
To say Chris Lau is a big fan of purchasing
cards would be a rather sizeable understatement. The truth
is, Lau, the Bausch & Lomb Asia Pacific director for business
process reengineering, is practically a purchasing card evangelist.
"P-cards are amazing. I love this product," he says,
waving his card in the air like some preacher waving a bible
from the pulpit.
You can't blame Lau for getting the P-card
religion. By eliminating the paperwork on just one low-value
transaction (under US$5,000), Lau is able to save the US-based
eyecare specialist US$100. Last year, Bausch & Lomb made
57,000 purchases in Asia. Usually, low-ticket trans-actions
make up about 80 percent of a company's purchases. The math
speaks for itself. Not surprisingly, Lau believes purchasing
cards could cut millions from Bausch & Lomb's operating
costs in Asia.
So far, the company has issued 30 Visa-brand
purchasing cards to department heads in Hong Kong. Lau says
he is now focusing on similar roll-outs in Malaysia, Singapore
and Australia, with subsidiaries in South Korea and Japan
to follow. The head of process reengineering says the company
plans to complete its Asian P-card roll-out over the next
18 months, ultimately issuing cards to most of its 1,000 or
so employees in the region. At that point, Bausch & Lomb's
management believes the volume of the company's P-card transactions
in the region will skyrocket. This is not just wishful thinking.
During the initial stages of Bausch & Lomb's purchasing
card roll-out in the US in 1997, the company conducted a mere
17 P-card transactions per month. These days, that number
is more like 4,000.
Supplying Suppliers
First launched by the US government in
1989 to rein in escalating expenditures, P-cards have been
enthusiastically embraced by American corporates. Today, over
60 percent of Fortune 500 companies have P-card programs,
with CFOs using the plastic to help reduce processing costs
for low value purchases and to outsource accounts payable.
Meanwhile, banks and credit card companies have created more
sophisticated cards, adding features like purchasing limits,
merchant category blocking codes and fraud identification.
Annual P-card transaction volume in the US now tops US$12
billion.
But in Asia, P-cards have not caught on
nearly so fast. The Singapore government rolled-out the first
purchasing card program in late 1995, followed soon after
by the Australian government. But local corporates have only
recently begun to cotton on to purchasing cards. Vendors now
estimate that some 300 to 400 Asian corporations use P-cards
in one form or another. "P-cards are coming into their
own," insists Raymond Hsiung, the Visa International
director of purchasing cards and commercial e-commerce for
the Asia Pacific region. "The awareness is there and
so are the benefits." Hsiung notes that P-cards are now
used in Asia in ways that surprise even veteran users. Some
Korean corporates, for example, have come up with creative
ways to cure the ills of a spotty electronic payments system.
These companies use P-cards to make business-to-business purchases.
One Korean company, Hsiung notes, buys tanker loads of gasoline
with its card. "Two years ago no one would have known
anything about a P-card," says Lau. "Now every country
- except India and Indonesia - has banks assisting corporations
in introducing P-cards."
But apparently, not all credit card vendors
are convinced that there is a mass corporate yearning for
P-cards in Asia (see box). At the moment, Visa dominates the
field, with an estimated 75 percent of the P-card market in
the region. MasterCard is the only other vendor of note making
a big P-card push in the region. "Sure there can be resistance
to P-cards," concedes Lau. "Without the right roll-out
strategy and the support of senior management a program can
fall flat on its face."
To avoid such a fate, Lau spent several
months working up a detailed implementation strategy for Bausch
& Lomb's Hong Kong roll-out. That strategy included the
formation of a cross-functional implementation team, made
up of members from the company's finance, purchasing and administration
de-partments. Moreover, Lau spent a lot of time lining up
agreements with banks and suppliers. Generally speaking, a
P-card program will stand or fall on the strength of its supplier
list. If employees are presented with a list that offers a
variety of useful goods and services, they will be more likely
to use their cards. Lacking such a list - and absent a buy-in
from senior managers - P-card programs are doomed to failure.
Cautions Hsiung: "Those who come to the table believing
a P-card is a simple program and start issuing cards to employees
right away are headed for a big surprise."
Pencil Pushers
A big, unpleasant surprise. Poorly thought-out
P-card programs can make a CFO look very very bad. Typically,
P-card failures are measured by the percentage of transactions
paid using the cards versus those paid using regular methods.
In failed implementations, the percentage of P-card payments
can be as low as 1 percent of total purchasing transactions
- an embarrassing figure. Conversely, in well-designed programs,
that percentage can go as high as 40 to 50 percent. At Bausch
& Lomb, the percentage of P-card transactions in Hong
Kong has already reached 29 percent for major purchasing categories,
or 7 percent overall. And that's only five months into the
roll-out. "For a P-card program to work effectively,"
Hsiung notes, "employees must be willing to look at the
procurement process with fresh eyes."
It's exactly that sort of corporate rethink
that led Lau to P-cards in the first place. Bausch & Lomb's
old purchasing system was not exactly a model of efficiency.
For example, Lau notes how complicated it was just to order
a US$40 box of pencils. To buy the pencils, an employee filled
out a requisition order form and passed it to the department
head for approval. The department head signed off on the requisition
form order and forwarded the request to the purchasing department.
The purchasing department then made a couple of calls to identify
the best supplier. Eventually, a purchase order was filled
out.
Within three or four weeks the pencils
arrived. But the purchasing process was far from over. The
invoice for the goods had to be punched into the accounting
system and matched against goods received, as well as the
purchase order. Finally, a check was cut to complete the transaction.
There was only one small snag: the cost of processing the
purchase of this US$40 box of pencils could top US$130. And,
under the old system, suppliers often received a check within
30 to 60 days. With P-cards, though, that same box of pencils
can be ordered and delivered for as little as US$10 in processing
costs. What's more, the pencils arrive in three to four days,
rather than three to four weeks. "The savings are unbelievable
huge," says Visa's Hsiung. "Under the old procurement
system the process could take over 40 steps and tie-up the
finance department, procurement department, requisitioners
and the accounts department. With P-cards the process is reduced
to between five and eight steps, depending on a company's
customization requirements."
Ex-Checkers
In return for this service, Bausch &
Lomb pays a transaction fee to the P-card bank sponsor - in
this case, HSBC. Suppliers also bear a portion of the cost,
usually kicking in from 1.5 to 3 percent of the purchase price
to the bank. They don't seem to mind, though. With P-card
programs, accounts payable are received from the bank within
days, thus improving cash flow and eliminating the need for
suppliers to chase invoices. Further, companies that use P-cards
often consolidate their purchases - and compliant suppliers
are often the main beneficiaries of such consolidation. "In
effect, we outsource our accounts payable and the suppliers
outsource their accounts receivable," says Lau.
Of course, outsourcing accounts payable
can be a worrying thing to a company's finance department.
P-cards can dramatically reduce the number of finance personnel
needed to write purchase orders and cut checks. Some companies,
in fact, have eliminated jobs in their finance departments
after implementing P-card programs. For his part, Lau prefers
to get his purchasing and accounting employees focused on
value-added tasks - rather than laying them off. "They
now have the time to improve the supplier base and develop
working relationships with suppliers."
Indeed, experts say P-card rollouts
are more about re-engineering and re-education than redundancies.
That's why P-card vendors and P-card users say P-card roll-outs
require a great deal of employee education. If a purchasing
card implementation is to work, they argue, long-standing
methods for handling procurement must be abandoned. This is
not always an easy sell. Bausch & Lomb's Lau says that
old corporate habits die hard - habits such as writing checks
for purchases. But like any true evangelist, he insists that
changing habits is a crucial part of changing minds. "The
message has to go out to employees not to write check requests,"
he says adamantly. "We simply will not process them anymore."
You can almost hear the fire and brimstone crackling in the
air.
David Lake is a Hong Kong-based business
and finance writer.
|