THE MAGAZINE FOR FINANCIAL DIRECTORS AND TREASURERS
  Home | Free email newsletter | Site map | Contact us 
 

Click to Visit
CORPORATE FINANCE September 2007

SURVEY SAYS FIX FX
Managing foreign currency exposure.
By Avital Louria-Hahn

You might expect that as corporations become increasingly global, they quickly develop effective systems to manage foreign currency exposure. They don’t, at least according to Fx software vendor FIREapps. Foreign exchange (Fx) is a complicated area that few companies understand or manage well. A reliance on manual systems is just one part of the problem.

In a survey of more than 100 US-based multinational corporations, FIREapps found that fully 98% had significant errors in their Fx spreadsheets, errors that ran the gamut from missing entities and income to incomplete calculations. Worse, says Andrew Gage, director of marketing at FIREapps, is that in 13% of the cases companies inverted numbers on a hedge. That means they were short where they should have been long and vice versa.

This probably wouldn’t surprise most of the respondents: the majority of the Fx managers surveyed said they don’t trust their own data or the systems that supply it. Assumptions underlying the numbers were also suspect.

In addition to the risk of mistakes and failure to meet FAS 52 requirements (which govern foreign currency translation in the US), companies can pay in other ways as well. For example, the study found that companies that don’t fully understand their exposure end up buying 30% more derivatives than they need. Lack of experience and high turnover within the Fx community contribute to the challenge of developing more-effective Fx systems.

Causes for Concern
Percent of survey respondents expressing concern or no confidence in key aspects of Fx management

Effective policy oversight / controls: 48%
FAS 52 compliance: 48%
Accurate accounting of exposure data: 45%
Appropriate risk mgmt. framework: 34%

Source: FIREapps


Click to Visit

Click to Visit