| CORPORATE FINANCE |
February
2005 |
FLYING THE INTEGRATION EXPRESS
A CFO's bold approach and flexible
touch helped DHL's post-merger integration plan take off.
By Niles Lo
Many know what it is to have a walk-on part in the integration
of two merging companies. Some curse the experience, but few
have the chance to prove that they might do better. Oliver Gritz,
until very recently CFO of express and logistics company DHL
Asia Pacific, is one of those rare souls who has played parts
on both sides of the drama. He knows what it's like to be in
charge, but also what it's like to be at the sharp end of integration.
"The integrators make their plans," he recalls. "Suddenly you
learn from colleagues that there's a major change coming. You
should have been told." Deutsche
Post, which owns DHL worldwide, has long been a company where
integration skills were tantamount to survival skills, and
Gritz has, by necessity in his job in finance, become a specialist.
The US$40 billion company began a prodigious series of rollups
in 1998, acquiring shares in parcel delivery companies in
Europe and the US, including 25 percent of DHL. In 1999, Deutsche
Post bought Swiss-based logistics giant Danzas Holding, which
is where the company picked up Gritz, who was working in finance
at a Danzas unit in Seattle. The mergers kept on coming. The
German postal giant acquired the Swedish freight forwarding
company ASG, and the distribution and logistics unit of Royal
Nedlloyd, a Dutch transport group. It followed with a quick
grab of QuickMail, a New York-based carrier, and then Air
Express International, a US airfreight forwarder. In 2002,
Deutsche Post raised its stake to attain full ownership of
DHL.
The buyouts made economic sense. The courier
business has notoriously thin margins. Returns on capital
are low and there's a high dependence on seasonal business.
What's more, the Asia Pacific region - currently at 11 percent
of DHL's global business - is the greatest area for growth
in the courier industry, and a region where competition is
mounting. The dominant player in the Asia Pacific region,
Federal Express, has 39 percent of the US-China express market.
DHL has a tentative hold on the number-two position, at 29
percent market share, whereas UPS holds 28 percent.
In such a competitive, thin-margin industry,
attaining economies from large scale is essential to success.
In Asia Pacific, this strategy is crucial for DHL, which stands
at a slight disadvantage to its two primary competitors. Federal
Express and UPS own their air fleets, while DHL leases space
from commercial airlines, a practice that leaves the company
exposed to greater volatility in prices than its rivals. "You
can't really survive unless you're big," says Gritz. "You
make most of your money through economies of scale. Scale
becomes the key to the value added."
Rolling them up
Mergers may reflect inevitable economic
logic, but it's never been easy to be in the middle of one.
In his stint in the Asia Pacific, Gritz has played a principal
part in two. As an executive of Danzas, he oversaw the integration
of the finance department after Deutsche Post completed its
acquisition of Airborne Express in 2001. This smaller merger
served as a dress rehearsal for the integration of Danzas
with DHL, which began last year and won't be complete until
2006. (Gritz was promoted in January this year to become CFO
of DHL's US unit.) In the Asia Pacific region alone, this
merger involved 20,000 employees and 2.5 billion euros worth
of business.
There's no academy to teach best practices
in merger integration. And despite the volumes written on
the subject, there's no science to making the process run
smoothly. Part of the problem is that while the economic goals
of mergers are hard and clear - improved profit margins, greater
market share, economies of scale - the means to achieve them
are largely 'soft' in their execution. These include management
and leadership skills, planning and 'cultural' issues, all
terms calculated to be annoyingly vague to those bid with
making the merger succeed.
Last year, the US Federal Trade Commission's
economics bureau presented a pr«ecis of the consulting-firm
and academic writing on the subject (see box, this page).
Several criteria emerged as necessary to a successful integration.
Deciding early on a strategy and sticking to it turns out
to be essential. Early planning for the integration of the
new physical and human assets improves the chances for success,
and so too does a fast pace and gaining early 'wins' in cost
savings. Appropriate incentives to meet merger targets are
also seen as helpful.
Gritz agrees with these pointers, and
adds that it's necessary to hire outside help. "As much as
you like to pretend that you don't like consultants, you're
going to need them," he says. "Because mergers by their nature
are extraordinary. Something on this scale doesn't happen
all the time.".
Getting Started
Early last year the merger steering committee
met and assigned an outside company to review where the likely
synergies would emerge. Gritz wouldn't reveal the name of
the consultant, as he says they decided to "change horses"
in the middle of the integration, dissatisfied with some of
the consultant's work. The assessment involved careful analysis
of conditions, including a review of personnel and technology
in both companies in key markets in the Asia Pacific, and
took several weeks. During the process, consultants interviewed
managers and employees to identify where synergies might be
found.
Meanwhile, the steering committee opted
for a strategy of dividing the integration into three stages.
It selected a single head of the combined finance department
- in this case, Gritz - and established Singapore as its location
as a first step. Next, it scheduled a group meeting of company
managers from both sides of the merger to look for the best
areas where a 'quick win' to reduce costs might be garnered.
The committee then sifted options for savings over the longer
term, and decided that installing a common management reporting
and financial transaction system, eventually leading to the
establishment of a financial shared services center, would
provide the best shot at delivering value.
Before being struck by disaster in December,
Phuket, Thailand was long seen as one of the more pleasant
spots in Southeast Asia to conduct a corporate get-together.
A group meeting of officers from the merging companies, DHL
and Danzas, was held at the seaside garden spot in March 2003.
Gritz decided to take the podium at the outset and declare
the obvious: that there would be some pain. "Prepare everybody
for what's going to come," he advises. "Hiding it isn't going
to make any sense; it's going to happen anyway." He adds:
"I said we are in for a tough ride. But we have a charter
here, we have a mission, and we want to get that right, and
we want everybody's input." To ease the inevitable tension,
the managers attended workshops that described the business
models of each of the companies, followed by competitions
to establish who understood the other company's business model
the best. Awards were given at a dinner. On the following
day, managers turned to the serious business of identifying
the 'low-hanging fruit'. After examining each others' businesses
in detail, the group established that the most promising tack
was to merge the customer accounting, receivable and collection
areas, unifying practices for the two major businesses: the
logistics business inherited from Danzas and the express delivery
business brought in from DHL.
It was clear there was room for improvement
in receivables and collections. Because the customer dynamics
of the two businesses differed, each had approached collections
in a different way. The logistics unit was made up mostly
of major, long-running accounts, comprising 60 percent of
the total. In this unit, the accounting department had learned
to interact with the sales team to collect money more quickly,
and systems had been put in place to closely track days sales
outstanding (DSO). The express business had never developed
a system of equal diligence, partly because the great body
of customers were individuals and businesses that paid immediately
on a one-off basis. But 20 percent of the customers held major,
long-term contracts, and it was in this portion where the
DSO performance needed a boost. The quick win involved transferring
the better processes of the logistics business over to express.
"Logistics and freight forwarding are
customized and very customer specific," explains Gritz. "You
cannot leave the process to the accounting department. What
we had developed in the systems environment allowed the sales
force to be involved." Eventually, applying these better practices
to the express business gained the company a 5.6-day reduction
of days sales outstanding, says Gritz".
The Soft Skills
Following Phuket, the staff hung up their
Hawaiian shirts and returned to their regional offices. In
Singapore, Gritz and the committee received the assessment,
and convened to decide what the integrated company would look
like. That meant beginning the painful process of determining
who would stay and who would leave in the merged organization.
Recalls Gritz: "All were trained finance people, and we knew
they had professional skills. But we had to decide who could
bring those skills into the environment of a much larger organization.
The organization was eight times larger after the integration
than it was before. So in the end, the selection process was
based on soft skills." Gritz declined to reveal the number
of finance employees that were laid off, but says that the
final selection included an equal proportion of workers from
Danzas and DHL.
Another key decision was in the offing:
how to handle the merger of ERP systems. Gritz asked the assessment
group to look at several options, including the unusual one
of scrapping both systems in favor of buying and installing
a new one. Having gotten the report back, Gritz opted for
a new ERP system entirely. After commissioning another report
to establish which system would be best, he opted for SAP-REM
for management reporting and SAP R/3 for processing financial
transactions.
The move now looks to be the boldest of
the merger process, delivering an upgrade, along with efficiencies
garnered by running a single system over the much larger merged
business, in one fell swoop.
Forward Momentum
When CFO, CFO Asia's sister publication
in the US, visited Gritz last autumn, he sat at a desk before
a complex timeline dominating the wall behind him. The chart
was laminated and featured a multiplicity of bars indicating
where various projects stood and where they should be. Most
were on target. Still midway through the process, the systems
integration was under way.
Gritz had opted for Malaysia as the best
target for the future shared services center. With a self-deprecating
smile, Gritz attributed the team's efficiency at deadlines
to his Germanic sensibility which dictates that "when things
are done, they are done 200 percent." Yet if anything has
characterized his tenure, it's the ability to build enough
wiggle room into the process to allow for flexibility. "As
long as there is forward momentum," he says, "you can afford
to be generous and delay something for a month." He adds:
"But you cannot be generous all the time; sometimes you have
to order somebody to do something."
Change midstream may be necessary in certain
cases, he says, but it has to be orchestrated properly. "If
you don't inform the people of the changes that are going
to come, you basically erode the authority of the managers
that you need to drive the process further," he says. Do this
enough times, and you can stall the integration.
Basically, he admits, integrations
are hard work. And this is one of the good ones."
Niles Lo writes
about mergers and acquisitions and human capital issues from
Hong Kong. got the Slim Slam.
|