| CORPORATE FINANCE |
February
2004 |
FRANKFURT - ALL ABOARD!
Hubei Pharmaceutical's journey to
a euro listing could serve as a model for other China plays.
By Jennifer Lee
A recent move by a US$9 million pharmaceutical company in China
to cross-list on the Frankfurt bourse has the makings of one
of those under-the-radar transactions that could influence others.
The company, Hubei Pharmaceutical Group, has a complex provenance
and is already listed on the OTC Bulletin Board in the US. Eric
Fletcher, the company's US-based CFO, says: "The Frankfurt listing
was not a move directly to raise capital. Listing in Europe
makes liquidity more possible for private placement holders
when their hold-period expires." That
may be so, or is perhaps a little disingenuous. Hubei now
has a doorway to raising equity in Europe, where the pharmaceutical
industry is a favorite play and investors with strong euros
are eager to buy a stake in China's future.
Searching for China Gold?
The company has ambitious founders. Hubei
started as the dream of Reid Li, a Chinese investor who was
seeking to form a vehicle to invest in local companies. Li
settled on the pharmaceutical industry as an ideal entry point
into China, confident of the sector's tremendous growth prospects.
He began looking to buy Chinese companies
in 2001 through his own US investment vehicle, Red Dot Capital.
"[He] realized that there was an excess of 8,000 pharmaceutical
companies in China, and that the government wanted to consolidate
the sector," says Fletcher. The government had intervened
actively to force consolidation. One way to achieve this was
through privatization. (As of this January there were more
than 3,000 pharmaceutical companies left in China.)
Li went about searching for the right
prospect with the methodical savvy of a seasoned venture capitalist.
He and his team began by selecting the region. "Xiangfan (in
northwest Hubei province) is the hotbed of high-tech in China,"
says Fletcher. Its other advantages include universities and
a ready source of high-skilled labor, an abundance of natural
resources, and easy access via road and rail to another nine
major cities in China.
The team met with "many tens" of companies
and, from these, they narrowed down to just a few. They insisted
that the companies be cash positive, but were only able to
look back three to four years because of the consistency of
the bookkeeping. What could they offer? A Western perspective
on management and market penetration, and techniques for maximizing
profitability.
Finally, the group selected Hubei Zenith
Airbeck Pharmaceutical, a state-owned enterprise with 4,000
employees that had been in business since 1968. Zenith Airbeck
was already a supplier to domestic and international markets.
Its business focused on contraceptives (a sure market with
the country's one- child policy; the company produces one-seventh
of China's contraceptive requirements), steroids, antipyretics
and analgesics, and tranquilizers. Competition was strong,
but then Zenith's contraceptives were listed as part of the
central government's national planning initiative, and it
had a new product - the morning-after pill, dubbed Luoshuang.
The deal they struck involves several
moving parts. Red Dot formed a joint venture with Zenith Airbeck's
dosage division, which had been producing about a third, or
US$9 million, of Zenith's annual revenue. Dosage was more
profitable than the company's bulk division, it's only other
unit. The joint venture took the name of Hubei Pharmaceutical
Company. Red Dot took majority control, at 57.14 percent,
injecting 40 million yuan of the joint venture's 70 million
yuan book value. Zenith Airbeck injected 30 million yuan and
retained all of the state-owned company's existing debt.
The deal also involved trademark and re-registration
of the dosage division's 120 pharmaceutical products and underlying
licences; opening a wholly owned subsidiary in Wuhan that
would act as sales agent for both the joint venture and the
Zenith Airbeck bulk division; and leasing facilities from
Zenith Airbeck at "favorable rates".
So how were Li and his team able to convince
Zenith Airbeck to give Hubei Pharma control over the cream
of its business? "There's no question that these were lengthy
and complex negotiations," says Fletcher. It took time to
build the trust required for the deal to go through, and it
was key that Li was a local. "We were not parachuting people
in to do the deal," says Fletcher, noting "That is essential
in China. Even if [a company has] a Chinese national who spent
most of his life abroad, it won't work."
Still, it took nearly two years to convince
Zenith Airbeck that the new management was not going to come
in and slash-and-burn. Li and his partners actually sent in
a transition team before the joint venture was finalized.
The team ended up staying for 18 months. A key point is the
length of this transition period. Many of the changes that
the group introduced into the company took place before any
move to make a public offering. "We had the basic agreements
by then, but it was undergoing a number of changes," says
Fletcher. "We would have had to report on things that were
going to change a month or two later."
A Reverse Takeover
Fletcher looked around for a candidate
for a reverse takeover last year, settling on Pan Asia Communications,
a telecommunications firm listed on the OTC Bulletin Board.
Pan Asia had first listed as Explore Technology in 1998 and
had failed in an attempt to buy a communications company that
spanned China and Singapore. It was essentially a shell for
a business venture that had stalled.
Like all reverse buyouts, it involved
some fancy footwork. Under the deal, Pan Asia used shares
to buy Red Dot's 57.14 percent interest in the joint venture,
but paid so many shares to Red Dot that the private company
actually become the owner of the public one. Pan Asia's shareholders
became a minority partner in a completely new, and promising
business plan. As soon as the transaction was finished, Pan
Asia changed its name to Hubei Pharmaceutical Group and set
about educating its new group of shareholders.
Next on the bill was the cross-listing
in Frankfurt this January. It "was done as a thank you to
European investors who have supported [the company]," says
Fletcher. What he means is that for European investors who
want to sell stock, the Frankfurt bourse is preferable because
it is more easily accessed and is cheaper than going through
American brokers.
Could a future offering via Frankfurt
be in the cards as well? "Europeans seem to understand that
China is going to become the dominant world economy," says
Fletcher, "and they seem to like the pharmaceuticals business."
The listing, says Fletcher, will have "no immediate fundraising
impact." He admits that there were costs associated with going
to Frankfurt, but that they tried to minimize these by doing
a lot of the groundwork themselves.
For now, in China, Fletcher and Li are
concentrating on growing the company. The joint venture already
recorded an increase in turnover for the first six months
of 2003 to US$6.7 million, and Fletcher projects turnover
to hit US$15 million in 2004. They are also looking to make
more acquisitions, possibly including the bulk division of
Zenith Airbeck. And what of the excess employees and debt
in that unit? Given the government's interest in consolidating
the sector, Fletcher says it is likely they will be able to
trim the workforce. And as for the debt, he says that it is
quite common for 50 to 60 percent of debt owned by state banks
to be written off, and that even 100 percent might be possible.
Toward that end, Hubei doesn't want to appear too keen, so
it can get the best possible deal.
Obviously, it's early days for Li
and Fletcher's China play. The two don't even rule out moving
out of the OTC Bulletin Board and seeking a listing on Nasdaq.
Why didn't Hubei list on Nasdaq instead of Frankfurt in the
first place? Fletcher says: "While we may do this, in the
end it was not a good use of the investors' money [today]."
By listing in Frankfurt, "we simply set the stage to put us
on a more competitive footing in the future, and we think
that's good for shareholders." 
Jennifer Lee is a contributing editor
at CFO Asia
|