| CORPORATE FINANCE |
December/
January 2004 |
BETTER FIELD OF PLAY
CFO Asia's fourth annual Deals of
the Year.
By Cesar Bacani and Abe De Ramos
Sars. War in Iraq. Global economic slowdown.
Clearly, 2003 never promised to be a great year in Asian corporate
finance. The first half of the year turned out to be as barren
of deals as the Hong Kong subway system was bereft of passengers
during the Sars scare. But in the doldrums, the region's CFOs
were regrouping. By the end of summer a strong stream of transactions
barely kept up with pent-up investor demand. Bankers are now
optimistic that the window that rose for lucrative deal-making
in September will remain open for some time.
Counter-intuitively, Asia's markets and
its companies look far more competitive at year-end than they
did before the global gyrations of 2003 held center stage.
Asian growth projections feature in the headlines every day.
China's economy has held stable amid volatile global economic
conditions. India is now a darling of global equity investors.
Even Japan seems to be showing stubborn signs of life. In
2003, Asia became more than a passive party to globalization,
but a leader in global best practices. We selected the deals
below as evidence that the region's CFOs - and the bankers
that supported them - are every bit as much players in this
phenomenon as the politicians and regulators that typically
grab the headlines.
Long may the good times roll.
Mergers and Acquisitions
Tsingtao
Brewery's alliance with Anheuser-Busch
Financial advisors: HSBC, Morgan
Stanley
When China's largest brewery decided it needed a strategic
investor, the logical partner was America's Anheuser-Busch.
The world's largest beermaker bought 4.5 percent of Tsingtao
when it listed in Hong Kong in 1993. Nevertheless, Tsingtao
had its financial advisor, HSBC, invite bids. Advised by Morgan
Stanley, Anheuser-Busch came up on top, but the message had
been sent. Should the preferred suitor balk at Tsingtao's
requirements, there were any number of world-class rivals
waiting in the wings.
The deal set a precedent for foreigners
wanting a strategic stake in China's leading companies. One
key issue was control. "Tsingtao is a hundred-year-old brand
and a treasured state asset," says Herbert Hui of HSBC's corporate
finance team. "[As] the issuer, you want to maintain control
while giving the strategic investor enough economic incentive
to come in and add value." The crux of the deal was the yawning
gap between Tsingtao's China-only A-shares and the free-for-all
H-shares. When talks started in May last year, H-shares were
trading around HK$2.25; A-shares, the equivalent of HK$8.50.
In the end, Anheuser agreed to pay HK$4.68
apiece for 194 million shares, a 31 percent premium over the
H-share price, and HK$4.45 for 114.2 million more. It also
agreed to limit its voting rights to 20 percent, even if it
accumulates up to 27 percent of Tsingtao. When the deal is
completed in seven years, Anheuser will have two board seats
and exposure to the world's biggest and fastest growing beer
market. Tsingtao will have raised US$181.6 million and gained
access to Anheuser's technical, marketing and corporate-governance
expertise.
To give the market time to absorb the
new issue, which would result in dilution, the deal was tailored
as a mandatory convertible bond with a seven-year maturity.
Anheuser was given three months to convert the bonds to 60
million H-shares, but has until 2010 to convert 248.2 million
more shares. Tsingtao agreed to pay 2 percent interest on
the bonds. Anheuser will return the money after conversion.
The lower price for the latter tranche
was Tsingtao's trade-off for Anheuser agreeing to dilute its
voting rights. Anheuser will enjoy all economic rights to
its 27 percent stake, but the Qingdao government will vote
7 percent of the shares. For Anheuser, it made little difference,
as the government will still control 30.6 percent post-conversion.
The trust agreement was done in Hong Kong, where H-shares
trade, as the contract would have been a nightmare to execute
in the mainland, where commercial laws are less transparent.
Something for foreign firms with similar intentions to ponder.
Shinhan's
acquisition of Chohung Bank
Financial advisors: JPMorgan,
Morgan Stanley
You know you're in Korea when you have to walk past rows of
labor protesters and shield-wielding policemen to execute
a corporate takeover. Such was the experience of Shinhan Bank
and its advisor JPMorgan when Shinhan acquired Chohung Bank,
which as the nation's oldest bank carried a lot of sentimental
value. In fact, the resistance was so great that it's hard
to think as coincidence the mysterious disappearance of crucial
loan files during Shinhan's due diligence.
The move was complicated by the government's
populist stance. KDIC, the state-owned agency that owned 80
percent of Chohung, announced its intention to sell its entire
stake during the run-up to the presidential election last
year. It commanded a price of 6,200 won per share, or 50 percent
above Chohung's share price then, and 1.8 times the book value.
It was much greater than Shinhan's initial valuation of 5,500
won apiece. "The government kept throwing out very high valuations
in the public arena, which created a big problem because it
was much less than these nominal values," says Helge Weiner-Trapness,
managing director at JPMorgan.
Shinhan played its card by pointing to
the missing loan files and the reticence of labor and management
that made it difficult to obtain accurate information about
Chohung. Shinhan, to be sure, would not pay the stated price
without a good grasp of Chohung's assets. The result was a
unique pricing structure that satisfied both buyer and seller.
Shinhan agreed to pay 6,200 won; however 1,200 of that amount
was payable only depending on the performance of some of Chohung's
assets in question. Part of the payment was also in redeemable
preferred shares that were set below market rates.
Effectively, the economic value of Chohung
went down to 4,600 won per share. "At the end of the day,
the government didn't lose face and was able to say they got
6,200 won for the transaction, even if it was just the nominal
value," says Weiner-Trapness. The contingent payment is a
unique structure in government privatizations in Asia. A normal
practice in the past was an asset quality guarantee where
the government would absorb the assets back if they turned
out to be a dud. The contingent structure provided comfort
to both parties. "Shinhan can very appropriately say, 'If
those assets turn out good, terrific, because we're basically
buying them at book value. But there are no guarantees that
those assets are real, so we have not included that in the
purchase price,'" says Weiner-Trapness.
The Chohung employees also win. The deal
will not be concluded until three years from now - although
system integration would have been completed way before -
and even then, there will be little overlap between the two
banks. Chohung's strength in large corporate accounts complements
Shinhan's strength in small and medium enterprises, and together
they make the second-largest bank in Korea, providing the
first real threat to Kookmin Bank.
NOL's
sale of oil tanker business to MISC
Financial advisors: JPMorgan,
Citigroup
There was a smile of victory behind the mask Lim How Teck
wore during negotiations for an asset sale at the height of
Sars. It was a smile that almost never was. The CFO of Singapore's
Neptune Orient Lines, a state-controlled container shipping
and logistics company, needed to sell an asset to offload
some of its debt, which stood at US$2.8 billion as of end-2002.
Texas-based American Eagle Tankers (AET), which ships oil
from the Gulf to the United States, was a cash-flow positive
asset, but was outside of its expertise. By October 2002,
NOL was sure it could sell AET.
Advised by JPMorgan, NOL invited bids,
and a number of Asian, North American and European contenders
turned up. But as months went on, most pulled out as some
found other strategic assets to acquire, while others realized
they would face financial constraints if they won the bid.
By early 2003, the war in Iraq loomed and Sars later turned
Singapore into a ghost town. Only one buyer was left standing:
Malaysia International Shipping Corp (MISC).
The adverse environment could have made
it impossible to sell AET, much less at a premium. Thankfully,
oil tanker rates were going up, and AET redrew its forecasts
upwards of 30 percent. Then came a contract to ship oil from
Venezuela to the east, which meant the tankers would earn
revenues sailing in both directions. "We separately carved
that asset out and [created] considerable anxiety that it
might not be part of the aggregate pool unless they bid aggressively,"
says Todd Marin of JPMorgan. That sent the message: although
only one bidder was left, NOL had an asset attractive enough
to sell to others.
MISC acted fast. Advised by Citigroup,
the company enlisted the services of the bank from M&A advisory,
credit rating defense, syndicated bridge financing, and support
for subsequent long-term funding. Citigroup put together US$830
million in funds at a tight price in three days. MISC paid
NOL US$445 million for 100 percent of AET, plus US$75 million
in dividends that AET declared last December. MISC also assumed
AET's debt, bringing the deal size to about US$1.1 billion.
For MISC, which is focused on Asian and
European routes, AET gave it access to the US market that
it has always craved. Going forward, MISC "has pretty much
everything open for them" in terms of long-term funding, says
Mohsin Nathani, managing director at Citigroup.
He adds, "MISC has not been a big borrower
in the loan market É and its parent (Petronas) was rated higher
than the sovereign, so the banks have a good appetite for
MISC." As deals go, both buyer and seller were happily afloat.
Equity
PICC
Property and Casualty's IPO
Financial Advisors: Morgan Stanley,
China International Capital Corp
China's largest non-life insurer badly needed fresh capital
and technical expertise. The problem: it was a state-owned
enterprise with opaque and confusing finances and a mix of
commercial businesses and non-paying government accounts.
The solution: carve out the profitable parts and inject them
into a new company to be listed in Hong Kong, and attract
a strategic investor that would introduce international operating
standards.
Talk about a tall order. People's Insurance
Company of China engaged Morgan Stanley and China International
Capital Corp (CICC) to get the deal done. The process started
in 2001 and culminated in July 2003 when PICC Property and
Casualty (PICC) was formed as a joint stock company with limited
liability. The old state firm was restructured into two entities,
PICC Holding, PICC's parent, and PICC Asset Management, which
absorbed some of the dubious investment portfolio.
For PICC, the journey was grueling but
instructive. For a start, it had to revalue its assets according
to international standards, and upgrade its actuarial analysis
and auditing. It also had to meet stricter solvency margin
regulations that China issued in March. While obtaining a
temporary waiver from the new rules, Morgan Stanley arranged
11 billion renminbi in loans and credit facility to enhance
liquidity. It also brokered an investment deal with the global
insurer AIG, which bought 10 percent of PICC. To promote good
governance, PICC named Standard Chartered Bank's Hong Kong
CEO Peter Wong as an independent director.
Hong Kong's hungry retail investors needed
little convincing, but institutional investors were a different
breed. In a meeting with 279 of them, PICC CEO Wang Yi and
CFO Wang Yincheng emphasized that while China's growth seems
unstoppable, they are keeping a conservative risk profile,
improving claims management and underwriting, and rationalizing
the investment portfolio. The result: US$20.6 billion worth
of orders. When the H-shares were floated in Hong Kong in
October, the institutional tranche was 50 times oversubscribed,
the retail tranche, 130 times. The IPO raised US$696 million
and an additional US$250 million from AIG.
The mad scramble begs the question: did
Morgan Stanley and CICC misprice the issue? Balancing fundamentals
and hype is always tricky. The bankers had responded by upgrading
the price range from HK$1.30-1.70 to HK$1.60-1.80. Retail
investors might have snapped up the offer at a richer valuation
- the stock was trading at HK$2.575 on November 14, up 43
percent from the IPO price of HK$1.80 - but it's unclear whether
institutions would have done the same. Nonetheless, PICC is
elated. The offering raised more money than expected, it won
credibility as it partnered with AIG and improved internal
processes, and it blazed the trail for other insurers.
Chunghwa
Telecom's American Depositary Receipt issue
Financial advisors: Goldman
Sachs, Merrill Lynch, UBS
It takes a lot of character to fight the system. Every year,
Lu Shyue-ching, president of Chunghwa Telecom, faces Taiwanese
legislators overseeing the former fixed-line monopoly. It's
often a painful process. Last year, they questioned an equipment
purchase, threatened its US$1.1 billion budget, and demanded
an overhaul in its billing system. Lu, who also acts as CFO,
needed plenty of nerve to persuade them to back off.
Fortunately for Chunghwa and other government-owned
companies, Taiwan is keen on privatization. Chunghwa had already
floated 16 percent of its shares in a local IPO in 2000. The
company planned to sell ADRs in New York later that year,
but it didn't happen until July this year. In the end, it
pulled in a sizeable US$1.58 billion. While the government
still owns 64.9 percent of Chunghwa, it is now progressively
handing control to the private sector.
The ADR process wasn't easy. The IPO came
amidst the technology craze; local investors snapped it up
at NT$104 per share. But the bubble was near bursting when
Chunghwa registered the ADR, so potential investors expected
a much-lower price. Lu knew it would have been political suicide
for a state jewel, and legislators would be displeased. The
opportune moment came in 2003 when the share price, adjusted
for dividends, settled around NT$50 amid market uncertainties.
Chunghwa's new chairman, Tan Hochen, also
provided leadership to the privatization process, says Kenneth
Poon of Merrill Lynch equity capital markets. A former vice
minister, Tan knew "what it took to bridge the gap between
the needs of the company, the government, and the international
investor base." He was a good match for Lu, who Mark Machin
of Goldman Sachs Asia capital markets lauds for his "extraordinary
energy" in communicating Chunghwa's story to foreign investors
since 2000.
"His conviction and passion for the company
is not what you expect from someone with a government-owned
enterprise," says Machin. "Chunghwa was marketed as a stable
company, constantly cutting costs and regularly paying out
excess cash in the form of dividends." Chunghwa has a 90 percent
dividend policy; this year, it translated to a yield of 8.1
percent over the ADR price.
Populist legislators expected a local
tranche for the offering, but Lu, Tan, and the bankers convinced
regulators to let Chunghwa use the foreign valuation.
The final price could have been excessive
if local investors went on another frenzy. They eventually
paid NT$49 per share, or an ADR price of US$14.24 (one ADR
equals 10 common shares). The local offer was 1.5 times oversubscribed;
the international tranche, 4.6 times.
This is all the affirmation Lu needed
to convince legislators Chunghwa is in good hands - and hopefully
leave it be.
Bank
Mandiri's IPO
Financial advisors: ABN AMRO
Rothschild, Credit Suisse First Boston
Bank Mandiri could get no respect. Formed in 1999 from the
merger of four state banks, it was derided as the by-blow
of four bad banks coming together to create one big bad bank.
In fact, Bank Mandiri had succeeded in cleaning up the balance
sheet, improving risk management and strengthening corporate
governance. "In less than two years, we had already put all
the [four banks'] systems into one platform," says CFO K Keat
Lee. Its bad-loans ratio is now just below 10 percent. The
challenge was to persuade investors to put money in Indonesia's
largest financial institution.
Lee knew they needed convincing. Investors
have long been dismayed by the string of political turmoil
in Indonesia, including the Bali bombing last year. So Lee
started the IPO process early. By June 2002, Bank Mandiri
and advisors ABN AMRO Rothschild and CSFB embarked on a non-deal
roadshow and attended investor conferences.
It paid off. More than 70 percent of participants
at the events placed an order. The offering, completed in
July, was oversubscribed even when priced at 1.08 times book
value. The size of the offer was increased by 45 percent during
the roadshow and another 55 percent in over-allotments, handing
Bank Mandiri US$327 million in fresh funds.
The deal energized Indonesia's business
sector. The first international IPO since 2000, it was a test
case of the state's acceptance by global capital markets.
Lee, of course, was elated. With the new funds, the bank gained
fresh impetus. "We have strong government and corporate relationships,"
he says, "but we're not providing [retail customers] with
credit cards, insurance products and mutual funds. We have
so many things that we want to do now."
Timing was important. "A year ago, Bank
Mandiri was unsellable [even at] book value," says J Marshall
Nicholson of CSFB's equity capital markets. War and terrorism
stalked the global economy. When the environment started to
improve in 2003, Bank Mandiri stepped on the gas and won shareholder
approval for the IPO in late May. Regulators required a 45-day
review, which meant registration would have been effective
in July - past the sell-by date of audited 2002 statements
for use in the IPO documents - but Bank Mandiri and its bankers
persuaded them to shorten it to 24 days. It also got the option
to increase the issue size.
The morning after was especially sweet.
Bank Mandiri closed 26 percent higher on its first trading
day. Four months on, the stock remains a market favorite,
trading at nearly 40 percent above the IPO price. Bank Mandiri
has gained the respect it craved..
Fixed Income
Hong
Kong's retail-targeted minibonds
Financial Advisor: Lehman Brothers
Ford
Motor Credit's cantobonds
Financial Advisor: Standard
Chartered
CFOs wondering where to put their money in this low-interest
rate environment are not alone; ordinary depositors, too,
have been looking for higher returns. So when Lehman Brothers
introduced the first "minibonds" targeted at Hong Kong retail
investors in January, it opened a new and enthusiastic funding
source that local and foreign CFOs could tap.
The concept of minibonds is simple. Lehman
pooled together US$50 million worth of outstanding Hutchison
Whampoa bonds - which were available only to big institutional
investors in lots of US$100,000 - and placed them in a special
purpose vehicle, Pacific International Finance. Its credit
derivatives team then chopped up the bonds into smaller lots
of US$5,000 each, and partnered with Sun Hung Kai Securities,
among other local houses, to market the bonds to their retail
clients. With a two-year maturity and an annual interest of
4.3 percent - better than a two-year time deposit - the minibonds
proved a hit, prompting Lehman to upsize the issue to US$80.5
million. The bank has since done close to US$300 million of
minibonds.
The deal is an investment-bank product,
but its importance is something CFOs should not ignore. The
success of the minibonds proved that - inasmuch as depositors
could look at the bonds as an alternative to bank deposits
- CFOs could tap the retail bond market as a viable alternative
to bank loans.
The market is clearly nascent, but it
is large; Lehman estimates at least US$400 billion in retail
deposits are languishing in Hong Kong banks. Indeed, the deal
paved the way for Ford Motor Credit's cantobonds - a combined
Hong Kong and US-dollar bond issue sold to retail investors
last September, which was later followed by Li Ka Shing's
Cheung Kong Holdings. For more about cantobonds, read "Canto
Bond Pops" in CFO Asia's November 2003 issue.
SP
PowerAssets' bond issue
Financial advisor: Morgan Stanley
The US$2.2 billion bond issue of SP PowerAssets marks a milestone
for Singapore Inc. As one of the flagship holdings of Temasek,
the investment arm of the Singaporean government, Singapore
Power had grown too big for its own good. Over the years,
it invested in numerous businesses at home and abroad, becoming
not just a power generation and distribution operator, but
also a holding company with wide interests, from venture capital
to telecommunications. The result is a corporate structure
that is both complex and lacking in transparency. This didn't
bode well for the government's plan to eventually privatize
its energy sector, and Temasek's intentions to monetize its
investments.
With this in mind, Singapore Power decided
to become a simple holding company. Over the course of a year,
it transferred the domestic electricity transmission and distribution
business to a newly created special purpose entity, SP PowerAssets
(SPPA). (The power generation business had earlier been uploaded
to Temasek.) Simple as it may sound, the restructuring involved
a series of complex steps, including pushing down Singapore
Power's debt to SPPA, and the creation of a new management
company that would run SPPA's assets and manage its contracts
and other licenses. Pushing down the debt at the asset level
was itself an arduous task, as it had to go through Singaporean
courts to obtain third-party lenders' consent.
Now, Singapore Power is a much easier
business to understand. It is a holding company - controlling,
among others, SPPA, SP International, and SP Capital - with
not too many people and no debt, says Sheldon Trainor, managing
director at Morgan Stanley. "Instead of [continuing to raise]
a bunch of money at Singapore Power [level] that they could
have used to finance future acquisitions or run their business,
they chose to make Singapore Power a very lean holding company."
Where does the SPPA bond issue fit in?
As Singapore Inc. moves towards privatization, it is most
likely to sell its stake in the operating companies. It had
to groom them in the process. As such, as part of the restructuring
effort, the new utility company was given a regulatory weighted
average cost of capital (WACC) to maintain. Having been injected
with the transmission and distribution business, SPPA had
to balance its WACC by leveraging the assets. The bond issue
brought its capital structure to 75 percent debt and 25 percent
equity, in line with global peers.
"In order to optimize the return on equity,
they needed to leverage up the assets at an appropriate level,
which was not prescribed under the regulatory regime, but
is consistent with any regulated utility such as in Australia,
the UK, or the US," says Trainor.
Equity-linked
Posco's
yen-denominated exchangeable bonds
Financial advisors: Deutsche
Bank, Merrill Lynch
When Asian CFOs think about raising funds overseas, they almost
always default to dollar-denominated instruments. Not Hwang
Tae Hyun of Posco. The CFO of one of the world's largest steel
makers chose to blaze trails by being the first Asian company
to issue Euroyen exchangeable bonds, in this case, a 2 percent
stake in SK Telecom. The transaction proved there is demand
to be met; the 52.88 billion yen bonds were twice oversubscribed
and commanded a conversion premium of 52 percent. More importantly,
Posco showed other Korean conglomerates another viable means
of unwinding their cross-shareholdings.
It was an equity-linked issue done right.
The success of a convertible lies in two factors: the creditworthiness
of the issuer to provide comfort for the bond interest payments,
and the volatility of the underlying securities to provide
potential gains.
In terms of credit, Posco was a good
candidate, with a single-A credit rating and a healthy, stable
cash flow. In terms of volatility, the underlying securities
were American depositary receipts of SK Telecom, which belongs
to an inherently volatile sector. The choice of currency added
to the volatility. "In yen volatility terms, SK Telecom is
1 to 2 points higher than in dollars, so by buying the security,
you're actually capturing a marginal benefit," says Sanjay
Arora of Deutsche Bank. Given these benefits, investors were
willing to pay a high premium for the conversion.
Posco enjoyed multiple benefits from issuing
in yen. First, it obtained a cheaper cost of funds, as seen
in the negative yield-to-maturity. Arora reckons that while
the conversion premium wouldn't have been different if the
issue was done in US dollars, the yield-to-maturity would
have been higher as US interest rates are 200 to 300 basis
points above Japan's. Second, the yen provided a natural hedge
to Posco's revenues from Japan. Also, part of the proceeds
from the issue went to refinancing a maturing samurai bond
(a yen-denominated bond issued in Japan by a non-Japanese
entity).
Much of the convertibles were sold to
European investors, but bookrunners Deutsche Bank and Merrill
Lynch also saw an increase in demand from Asian investors,
who had typically preferred dollar-denominated, plain vanilla
deals. The Posco deal opens an idea for Asian corporations
to diversify their funding sources into the currencies of
markets they trade with. "Companies are now beginning to think,
'Do I want to issue in dollars because the dollar will depreciate,
or do I want to do it in local currency or yen as a hedge
to my underlying business?'" says Arora. It wouldn't be surprising
to find Asian issuers tapping the Australian dollar, Singapore
dollar, or euro convertible markets. "
SingTech's
exchangeable bonds
Financial advisors: Citigroup,
Credit Suisse First Boston
As CFO of Singapore Technologies, Ng Boon Yew is flooded by
financing proposals. So when the top government-linked corporation
(GLC) sought to raise cash for working capital and acquisitions,
he already knew his options. Why not unlock the value of the
company's stakes in listed subsidiaries by issuing exchangeable
bonds against them?
Thus was launched a potentially transformative
exercise for SingTech and other GLCs. Critics deplore how
the GLCs stifle competition, innovation and entrepreneurship.
The deal showed that Singapore is taking a step toward divestment.
For Temasek, the state investment firm, the deal was also
a painless way to reap returns without immediately giving
up control.
SingTech knew what it wanted: fat conversion
premiums over the current stock prices, a long maturity to
maximize the chances of convertibility, and the lowest fees
possible. Ng also wanted to launch not one but two offerings
backed by stakes in CapitaLand and ST Engineering. He invited
15 investment banks to bid to get the best price. (Too many,
grumbled the bankers.) To guard against market risk, Ng wanted
the deal done fast. So ten minutes after the Singapore Exchange
closed at 5 pm on October 2, SingTech formally requested bought-deal
terms. By 8 pm, it awarded joint books to Citigroup and CSFB.
By 1 am on October 3, the banks had sold the bonds on a first-come
first-served basis.
The pricing attracted premiums of 46.7
percent for CapitaLand and 45.8 percent for ST Engineering.
"These premiums are extraordinary," says Kirsty Mactaggart
of Citigroup's equity capital markets. "They got US$464 million
monetized upfront and the yield was just 1.08 percent a year
[for CapitaLand] and 1.56 percent [for ST Engineering].
SingTech locked in S$800 million
in financing at a cost of 1 percent." The maturity was set
at seven years, with the put provision kicking in after five
years. Assuming full exchange, SingTech will still end up
in control of 52.5 percent of CapitaLand and 51.1 percent
of ST Engineering. There was one hitch. SingTech wanted the
bonds to trade as soon as the market opened to avoid disruption
to the underlying shares. But documentation took a while,
so the bonds got listed only in the afternoon. In the gray
market, they traded up to 3 percentage points below issue
price. But the bonds stabilized. New exchangeable bonds may
be in the offing. Says Mactaggart: "This is an ideal structure
for [GLCs] and I'm sure you'll see more." 
|