| HUMAN RESOURCE/ MANAGEMENT |
September
2003 |
ALL IN THE GROOMING
GE and American Express have developed
fast- track programs for the top talent in their finance teams.
But is the star system the best approach?
By Lotte Chow
It's not every day that a CFO fresh off
the plane draws a line in the sand. But Wayne Chang, who became
CFO of General Electric's Medical Systems China unit two years
ago, walked into the job in Shanghai with a certain confidence
that people would listen to him.
He needed it, because GE's China goals
were typically big. His mandate: pushing company sales to
US$1 billion from US$200 million in five years, or to 30 percent
from 20 percent growth a year. Chang's strategy for growth
involved customer financing, the first time that GE had tried
this outside of its aircraft leasing activities in China,
which structured deals in US dollars.
The customer financing at the medical
unit would be in renmimbi and would involve close relationships
with Chinese banks.
Customer financing naturally bolsters
growth, but also carries the risk associated with arranging
loans for customers in boom markets. The practice came under
fire in the US after many technology companies' customer-financing
programs went bust after the tech bubble burst.
Ultimately, Chang was able to overcome
reservations and built confidence in the plan. "A lot of people
would like to buy our products but need financing to be able
to do so," says Chang, who is 34 years old. "So we have to
find an external third party, say banks, to provide financing.
But China being an immature financing market, we have to carefully
manage risk in order to successfully drive growth," he says.
The success of the project hinged upon
the capacity to pore through balance sheets of potential business
partners and instill risk management skills to his staff.
Chang had good experience to contribute here. He had spent
long hours as an internal auditor to GE units around the world
as part of the company's fast-education training program for
finance executives. As for meeting those Herculean goals:
Chang says he's on schedule. GE Medical Systems China is growing
at 25 percent per annum with a projected US$600 million revenues
for yearend 2003.
Leadership, or effrontery
Chang's confidence might have struck some
long-time employees as effrontery, but GE has made a policy
of encouraging its finance professionals to assert themselves.
Chang is one of 15 CFOs in GE's worldwide operations that
entered the company in a special training unit designed to
instill leadership into a finance team - and make those skills
transferable across hemispheres and cultures. Other global
companies, including American Express, Procter & Gamble
and Microsoft have also developed leadership and fast-track
career programs, and swear by them as costly, but ultimately,
value-building long-term investments. In Asia, the concept
is relatively new but several companies with global reach
have created their own campuses to train the cream of their
recruits. These range from Infosys, the Indian IT service
provider which runs a leadership institute at its campus in
Bangalore, to Legend, the Chinese computer maker, which has
its own management school on the outskirts of Beijing.
Building in corporate efficiency and accountability
through in-house training is not, however, a route that all
companies can take. As Hellmut Schutte, dean of the business
education institution INSEAD in Singapore, points out, most
companies don't have the resources. And even if there is money
for grooming would-be finance chiefs, human resources may
be a problem. Not every company can afford to lose 20 or 30
people to a training program, and not every one of those same
people is likely to be capable of training. "If you're a good
manager, it doesn't mean you are a good teacher," says Schutte.
Even if you are, it may not be enough,
according to Larry Lang, professor of finance at Chinese University
in Hong Kong. A textbook-perfect teacher dedicated to turning
out the "exceptional finance professionals" of a GE-scale
training program may find the textbook itself is inadequate.
"You know these general kind of training materials are not
successful for China. There's nothing wrong with the theory
but you need in-depth discussion, you need local cases, you
need to adapt for the local environment."
Getting the right local spin on training
materials for CFOs is not as important as it is for CEOs,
says Lang, but it is still vital for finance chiefs to know
the market and to be more than aware of the law from liability
down to the ever-changing minutiae of the rules on IPO reporting.
The other, perhaps lesser problem is that
instilling a strong sense of corporate culture could result
in narrow-minded rather than single-minded leaders. "That's
the drawback with any internal program," says Schutte, "it
leads to in-breeding. Some companies have a corporate culture
and they manage - although I don't like to use the word -
to clone each other."
That said, Schutte concedes that big in-house
training programs can spawn plenty of healthy debate among
"graduates", particularly if their corporate alma mater has
a diverse range of businesses. He also points out that there
are Asian companies that have enviable training facilities.
"Korea and Japan have large institutions, particularly Japan,
and many business schools would pale in comparison." And large
institutions, inevitably, can seek out the best of the young
high-fliers.
Talent, and hype
GE, of course, is famous for this type
of talent scouting, and many cliches that have sprung from
its "culture". Readers of business magazines have for years
heard of the wonders of Six Sigma, the program used by GE
and others to promote excellence, stretch goals, and, pace
GE's famous former CEO Jack Welch, doing things "straight
from the gut."
Given GE's rocky performance in the last
year, skeptics have questioned whether creating a star system
within a company is an effective method of harnessing an organization's
creative energy. After all, the focus on talent and dynamism
at Enron under former McKinsey consultant Jeffrey Skilling,
who served as the energy trader's president, led to a kind
of creative destruction that was a wonder to behold: the biggest
corporate bankruptcy in the US up until that time and, in
addition, thousands of people out of a job.
Some experts argue that it is precisely
because renegade finance teams led to disasters at Enron and
Worldcom that more - and better - leadership training is needed.
"Companies know the public and their shareholders want accountability
and transparency, partly to reduce the risk of future Enrons
or Tycos," says Jonathan Schiff, president of New York-based
Schiff Consulting Group that specializes in finance leadership
development.
Fresh from school
GE's Financial Management Program (FMP)
recruits right out of college and places its highest potential
employees in its Corporate Audit Staff, where they travel
among the company's units as independent internal auditors.
This gives them both lessons in independent judgement and
an overview of the company's operations. "We have always believed
in driving financial leadership and creating a huge pipeline
of financial talent within the company for GE," says Roshan
Thiran, human resources manager for GE's finance professionals
in Asia and director of the region's FMP.
The company started FMP in the US in 1919
and began a program in Asia 30 years ago. Today, some 75 percent
of GE's top 20 business CFOs are FMP graduates.
Wayne Chang graduated from Indiana University
in Bloomington, Illinois in the US in 1991. Never mind that
he was an economics and psychology major and had never set
foot in an accounting class, GE saw his drive and ambition
and recruited him into its FMP. The program offers its participants
four job rotations within a two-year period to learn all areas
of finance and accounting, business development, strategy
and controls. Chang's first assignment was at GE Aerospace,
a manufacturing plant in Utica, New York, doing cost accounting
and financial reporting. After six months, he moved to internal
auditing, handling compliance and policy issues. His third
job was financial planning and analysis focused on product
line profitability, long- and short-term forecasting, variance
analysis, risks and opportunities. His last assignment was
at the company's Ocean and Radar Systems headquarters where
he was an operations analyst dealing with total business measurements
such as sales, margin and cash.
In each rotation, Chang picked up new
skills and learned from his mentors and coaches through continuous
feedback and regular performance reviews. He also attended
lectures taught by GE senior managers and studied with other
FMP participants via the internet. "My lack of training in
finance in college was not a huge disadvantage, because GE
picks people who can learn quickly and gives them opportunities
to learn," says the Beijing-based Chang.
After getting a grounding in finance and
learning how a business operates, Chang got his first real
job as investment analyst at GE Aerospace headquarters in
Syracuse, New York. After two years, he was fast-tracked to
another GE finance leadership development program: the Corporate
Audit Staff where he got to travel first around the US and
later in Europe and Asia, auditing the company's businesses,
doing due diligence and special investigations.
Chang recalls that as an auditor, he sometimes
worked as much as 80 hours a week and traveled to two countries
in one day. "It was one of the most demanding yet rewarding
jobs I've ever had," he says. As an auditor, Chang added supervising
responsibilities to his list of talents, first by looking
after a team of five to eight people and later 10 to 20.
After six years as an auditor on the road,
Chang became executive audit manager for Asia, based in Tokyo.
Two years later, he was offered the CFO job for GE Medical
Systems China. How has FMP and auditing helped him in the
new job? "FMP develops your functional and critical thinking
skills," Chang says. "It helps you analyze situations to plot
strategies, move from facts to root causes, anticipate consequences
and build problem-solving solutions."
Aside from skills, knowledge and
experience, participants say finance leadership development
programs offer other valuable benefits. Wee-tuck Tan, the
Singapore-based CFO of CNBC Asia Pacific, a GE subsidiary,
says the contacts he made during his time in Corporate Audit
Staff have proven valuable. "I've found the people I met and
the friends I made while I was in Corporate Audit have been
tremendously responsive whenever I need their help," says
Tan, who joined Corporate Audit seven years ago and who, like
his peers, has worked in the US, Europe and Asia. He adds:
"I know when I pick up the phone, I'll be talking to someone
I know."
LC
|
Job Rotation Anyone?
American Express may not be as big
as GE, but its leadership development program is as elaborate.
Amex's global job-rotation program trains its MBA recruits,
but includes high potential employees as well. While the MBAs
get a three-year rotation during which they are introduced
to a range of disciplines in global finance, the company high-fliers
get job swaps for two years to gain exposure in diverse roles
for cross-functional development, work experience in different
cultures, exposure to senior management and an opportunity
to build networks within the company.
Carol Robinson, who joined Amex
International Corporate Audit department as project leader
in the UK four and a half years ago, is one of three internal
employees selected for the global rotation program. An auditor
for 10 years, five with UK accounting firms before joining
Amex, Robinson has been managing high-profile international
audits and leading teams of up to four people. But she is
keen to expand her management responsibilities and develop
cross-functional finance skills. Her first post on the rotation
scheme, starting on September15, will be travel finance manager
in Sydney.
In her new position, Robinson will
have wide responsibility. She will supervise a team of 13
while maintaining the reporting, accounting and controllership
of the travel office. She will also be expected to promote
changes to reduce cost and conduct research. And, as if that
wasn't enough, she must in addition resolve requests from
senior management relating to changes in accounting practices,
and identify opportunities and new approaches to a process
or project. To ensure the development of her leadership talent,
Robinson will have Amex's finance controller for Australia
and New Zealand, Peter Pak, as her mentor. She will also network
with other Amex finance leaders and utilize Amex's Finance
Virtual University for learning.
"I want to succeed at American
Express and the finance leadership development program will
provide the necessary tools to help me achieve my goals,"
says the 32-year-old.
In-house finance leadership programs
aren't without their critics. Some consultants say the programs
foster a mentality of survival of the fittest and pressure
everyone to perform or perish. Academics, like INSEAD's Schutte,
argue that by learning, working and mingling only within their
companies, participants miss out on outside exposure. "They
could lack a wider view of the world and how other companies
and managers operate," says Rae Weston, professor of
management at Macquarie Graduate School of Management in Sydney.
But the companies defend their programs
by saying that a performance-based system that rewards those
who deliver is a good way of identifying and developing talent.
As for outside exposure, Pak, Robinson's about-to-be mentor,
says Robinson will get to mix and network with other finance
professionals when she attends functions and training courses
held by organizations such as the Australian Certified Chartered
Accountants.
LC
|