|
WEB SPINNERS
Webcasting corporate news is starting
to catch on.
By Yasmin Ghahremani
Last December wasn't the most popular
month for an IPO. Still, the time was right for Hong Kong-based
Eco-Teck Holdings. The environmental equipment maker went
public with a US$6.3 million share offering on Hong Kong's
Growth Enterprise Market on December 5 and did so successfully
- thanks in part to its adoption of webcasting, the latest
wrinkle in corporate communications technology.
It happened like this. One of the company's
lead underwriters, a young Hong Kong-based investment bank,
SBI E2-Capital, decided to use the Internet to help sell the
placement to investors outside the region. The bank contracted
its partner, webcasting firm OpenIBN Technologies, to shoot
a video of Eco-Teck's presentation luncheon in Hong Kong.
It then invited 55 institutional and individual investors
in London and Paris to view the video on-line any time within
the next three days.
Fifty-four did so, following up with questions
via email or phone calls to the bank's sales representatives.
The gambit worked. The offer was 60 times oversubscribed and,
helped by the strong international demand, Eco-Teck's share
price rose from its initial HK$0.25 (US$0.03) to 62 cents
(US$0.79) by the end of January. Even better, the webcast
raised awareness of Eco-Teck among European investors at a
fraction of the normal cost. "It's a very efficient way to
reach people," says Ronald To, SBI E2-Capital's vice-president
of investment banking. "You save all that time and money you'd
otherwise have to spend travelling to meet them face-to-face."
The Virtual Road Show
More and more companies like Eco-Teck
are catching on to the value of webcasts as a cost-effective
tool for communicating. Webcasts involve audio and video delivered
over the Internet either as live footage or as a file that
can be archived and played later. They're being used for everything
from internal announcements and training to external marketing.
But there are still limitations to what webcasts can achieve.
They aren't television over the Internet. Using them effectively
means setting reasonable objectives.
Here's how a webcast is born. The audio
and video are recorded, then digitally encoded in Internet
form for any or all of the three main media players used for
viewing webcasts: RealPlayer, Windows Media Player or QuickTime.
PowerPoint presentations can be included too. Generally, if
a webcasting company handles the production it will also host
the content on its servers. It can also customize the webcast
for users logging on at various data transfer speeds.
The cost depends partly on whether the
event is webcast live or taped for later viewing. Live webcasts
are more expensive because they have to be mixed, encoded
and uplinked on-site. Singapore's B2Bcast, a company that
specializes in business-to-business streaming media productions,
says its prices for live webcasts start at US$8,000. Archived
video-on-demand can be as low as US$3,200 for 30 minutes.
As the number of concurrent users increases, so does the amount
of bandwidth consumed, driving costs up. One way to lower
those costs is by using a content distribution network, which
places content on servers in the countries where the most
viewers are expected. That way, you take advantage of local
connections, which are cheaper than international ones.
Not surprisingly, investment banks are
at the forefront of corporate webcasting. Many multinational
institutions now consider on-line roadshows a standard marketing
tool for share offerings. Salomon Smith Barney's Hong Kong
office, however, has steered clear of video in the webcasts
it arranges for clients, simply delivering audio with a PowerPoint
presentation instead. The sales team alerts potential investors
about the on-line roadshow and distributes the necessary passwords.
Investors have the option of watching the slides while listening
to a conference call as well. At about US$10,000, the production
costs are reasonable. "It can cost up to US$100,000 to send
a team of ten people on the road for three weeks," says Kirsty
Mactaggart, managing director of Salomon Smith Barney in Hong
Kong. "So it's a small cost in the scheme of the bigger roadshow
expenses,"
Conference organizers are also discovering
the appeal of webcasts. When Nokia's Singapore office held
a conference for the third-party developers that are crucial
to its business, it enlisted US portal Yahoo to put the event
on the Internet. Marketing was a joint effort, with both companies
posting notices on their websites. Nokia also emailed news
of the webcast to developers in its database. Some 500 people
showed up at the conference in person, but more than double
that amount logged into the on-line version within the three-month
period it was available. "This is a way for us to reach people
who couldn't otherwise travel to make it to the show," says
Nokia's business development manager Sirta Ikola. "It's definitely
worth the money for us."
It's Got to be Free
Making cold, hard cash from on-line events,
however, is much tougher. BusinessWeek, which webcasts many
of the 15 to 20 conferences it hosts every year, tried charging
for the on-line version of its Fifth Annual CEO Forum, held
in Hong Kong last year. It got less than 100 takers in the
three-month viewing period. BusinessWeek marketing director
Emma Fung thinks that at US$295 for a one-month pass, or US$49.50
for a two-day trial, the price tag for the webcast may have
been too high. "We were a bit disappointed with the numbers,"
says Fung. "I don't think we'll be doing fee-based on-line
conferences any time soon," she says.
Even free webcasts can fail if users lack
adequate bandwidth for viewing the presentation comfortably.
At 56 kbps, video can take ages to load, and then it will
run in fits and starts. Hewlett-Packard's (HP) Asia Pacific
division last year created a 60-second video demonstration
of a new scanner for distributors and consumers and put it
on the HP website. It hoped for 10,000 hits but only got 1,500.
"The file was too heavy and intensive for the bandwidth,"
says Simon Johnstone, on-line channel manager at HP in Singapore.
"From now on we would probably use animated GIFs or shockwave
for that kind of an application. Or it would have to be tied
to some sort of promotion, rather than just increasing general
awareness," he says.
Cheaper technology options are emerging.
Microsoft has included software with its Office XP suite of
business programs intended for do-it-yourself webcasts. You
supply your own digital video and audio, which for simple
talking-head presentations can even be recorded with a US$50
webcam and a PC microphone. You can then combine them with
PowerPoint slides and use the Microsoft Producer PowerPoint
2002 software to put them on-line. "Producer tries to do for
webcasting what FrontPage did for web pages," says group manager
for marketing at Microsoft, Jason Reindorp in the US, referring
to the user-friendly program that helped popularize amateur
websites. For marketing or external communications applications,
it's still probably better to have the video professionally
shot. But the basic technology for uploading it is now much
more accessible. And that can only mean corporate use of webcasts
will continue to rise in the future.
Yasmin Ghahremani is a freelance writer
based in Hong Kong.
|
Cheap Connections
Videoconferencing has come a long way
in recent years. The technology, which allows users to see
and hear each other on-screen in real time, was once the sole
preserve of big-budget companies. But it's now easy and cheap
enough for even smaller firms to use as a cost-effective alternative
to travel. US consultancy Frost & Sullivan estimates global
videoconferencing equipment sales increased 15 to 17 percent
last year, with Asia being the world's fastest-growing market.
The reason? Picture quality has improved
and costs have drastically lowered. Heidi Lorenzen, Asia Pacific
marketing director for videoconferencing equipment maker Polycom
says that before 1998 a system would cost US$50,000. "Today
you can get an entry level system for US$4,000," she
says. And they're about as easy to use as a VCR. There are
two types of systems: cheaper desktop versions that deliver
video to a PC through an Internet connection; and set-top
boxes that connect to television monitors, usually via leased
lines. Both can include presentation materials.
An even cheaper solution is to use a webcam
and microphone, along with Microsoft's free NetMeeting program
or the newer videoconferencing software included with Windows
XP. But the quality is far from perfect. "We've found
it's better to just turn off the audio and make a phone call
while you've got the video and slides on screen," says
Russell Yeomans, regional director for recruitment company
TMP Worldwide, which uses NetMeeting internally. For interviewing
candidates TMP uses a set-top box system that delivers higher
quality. Still, Yeomans does not recommend that a client make
a high-level appointment without meeting the candidate. For
all its advantages, videoconferencing will never replace the
handshake.
YG |