|
ASSET LITE
How an asset-light business model
broadens the functions of a CFO
By Abe De Ramos
To see Frank Leong in action is to know
that a CFO's job in Asia will never be the same. Leong is
a relaxed, but intense, man, with a winning smile and an iron-trap
mind for detail. He needs it. He begins a typical morning
poring over cash balances, reconciling a unit's financial
statement, and ironing out a new strategy to keep costs of
a project down. He informs unit managers that their upgraded
computers are on the way. He phones another to guarantee that
a network connection will come on-line. He signs several appointment
letters and confirms two transfers. He then finds time to
decamp to a warehouse to inspect the quality of one of his
company's shipments. Wandering amid the teddy bears, he looks
like a kid in a toy store. Only two hours have passed, and
already he has spent time between finance, human resources
and information technology.
If you think that Leong is
the CFO of a US$10 million company and does all this because
he can't afford to delegate, you'd be wrong. Leong is CFO
of Li & Fung, a US$4.2 billion-a-year Hong Kong company with
offices in 40 countries across the globe. Leong manages this
way out of choice, because it's the best way to do his job
under Li & Fung's asset-light business model. Asset-light,
you say? Meet the homegrown Asian corporation that gave meaning
to the term. The 96-year-old firm is in the supply-chain business,
making sure that retailers such as Levi's and The Limited
have enough apparel to hang on their racks for the next fashion
season. At its core is a business strategy that allows it
to match clients with factories, and monitor the design, production
and delivery of the goods, at speeds faster than its rivals
do. Behind it is an organizational structure that masks its
size: Li & Fung is made up of pockets of business units -
some with as little as a head count of one. Each acts as its
own corporation, with its own customers and profit and loss
accounts..
Sister Act
PA success like Li & Fung isn't created
in a vacuum. It's no surprise that another Asian trading company
has deployed the model in a different business - and struck
gold. Noble Group, also based in Hong Kong, has inserted itself
into the supply chain for coal and cocoa. Going Li & Fung
one better, it is now including financing and risk management
in its mix of offerings. And proving that Leong is no exception,
it has a jack-of-all-trades in the guise of a finance manager
at its core.
"The comparison with Li & Fung is not
by accident. We have followed them in parallel, only we're
less high profile," admits David Sullivan, Noble's group treasurer.
"Li & Fung is known as a garment trading company, but it's
not; it's an integrated logistics company. Likewise, we don't
see ourselves as a commodities trading company, but as an
integrated merchant company on a global scale," says Sullivan.
So far, taking inspiration from Li & Fung has worked well.
In 2001, Noble made a record US$1.9 billion in sales, up 53
percent from 2000, while net profit grew 11 percent to US$23.5
million.
One other glaring similarity between the
two companies is the level of responsibility their CEOs have
given their CFOs - far beyond reporting, accounting and calculating
hurdle rates. Leong runs the machinery that gave Li & Fung
the agility to double profits every three years since 1995.
Sullivan, meanwhile, runs an internal bank that mitigates
the price and physical risks of moving time-sensitive commodities.
Harvard Business School has already written
a case study on Li & Fung's supply-chain system. It may be
time for another, because the asset-light model stands at
the center of Asia's recovery hopes. Salomon Smith Barney
economist Donald Hanna spoke recently in Hong Kong about an
encouraging development: Asian companies are beginning to
produce more goods with less capital, a long-term trend that
will deliver enormous benefits to the region's economies.
While much of the increased productivity is due to low wages,
experts now see improved business methods as a key driver.
Within Li & Fung's and Noble's grasp is a paradigm that matches
conservation of capital with flexibility of control. In this
environment, the CFO must reign supreme over all fundamental
company operations.
"I'm like the CEO of an internal service
company," Leong says of his role as the head of Operation
Support Group (OSG), Li & Fung's back-office hub. With few
fixed assets and capital investments to manage, Leong finds
himself in a position to become a business partner. This is
exactly how Li & Fung has positioned him to be. Victor Fung,
the chairman, takes care of long-term vision. William Fung,
the CEO, looks after the day-to-day progress of the business.
Two executive team members oversee the US business; another
manages the merger with Colby, a former competitor that is
being maintained as a separate brand; a fourth takes care
of Europe; and a fifth manages hard goods sourcing (including
furniture, which makes up 28 percent of revenues). Leong,
the sixth member of the team, takes sole responsibility for
oiling the machinery by which Li & Fung operates.
Leong thinks a CFO becomes a business
partner when he or she takes a holistic view of the business.
He may be a perfect fit for his role, having an undergraduate
degree in IT and accounting from New Zealand and an MBA from
Australia. But Leong makes a case for his role by arguing
that the CFO is, in fact, best positioned to handle functions
that impact the whole organization. "To run a business efficiently,
you have to control the cost while upholding standards, and
at the same time balance the service level of your company,"
he says.
Leong does all that by running the OSG,
the nucleus of Li & Fung. Its tentacles reach out to every
single business unit - currently 120 in 40 countries - that
specializes by product, product line or customer. "Each business
unit is the single point of contact of the customer, and this
makes us as customer-focused as possible," says Leong.
This fa?ade is backed by a powerful engine
- an IT system that keeps a database of 6,000 factories around
the world. (About 2,000 of them are producing for Li & Fung's
700-plus customers at any given time.) The database is accessible
to the whole supply chain, from the headquarters in Hong Kong,
to the business units, factories, shippers and retailers.
It contains not just profiles of each factory in terms of
products and capacity; it is also a hub for customers to check
the progress of their orders, from production to shipping.
From his fourth floor office at an obscure building in noisy
Kowloon, Leong runs and maintains this network, which is a
crucial element to Li & Fung's value proposition.
Trade Oomph
AThis is how the company adds oomph to
traditional trading. Instead of simply sourcing clothes for
mostly US and European retailers, Li & Fung works with them
on the design of their products. "Our people sit down to share
with them the latest information from the production side
- what sort of material is hot, what new colors are available,
where a product can be produced," says Leong. This expands
the fashion retailers' knowledge of materials available in
the market, and thus gives them greater creative (and financial)
liberty in designing their clothes for the season.
"We then take their concept, and
from there develop a prototype of the garment," says Leong.
All the information that Li & Fung needs to work with customers
is in the database, which is updated real-time, so any business
unit can quickly respond to a client regardless of volume
of order or complexity of design. After a design has been
finalized, Li & Fung places the order on the customer's behalf,
and sends quality control people to check the production.
Because garments are not just produced in one place - a yarn
may be bought in Korea, dyed in Taiwan and sewn in Thailand
- Li & Fung also provides logistical support for each stage.
"A lot of our customers arrange their own shipping, but we
can organize shipping for them," says Leong.
The OSG supplies each unit with personal
computers and a network connection. "We provide an IT system
across the world, and charge them per PC, which covers the
whole network - order processing, production tracking, email
communications," says Leong. "If you need 15 PCs, I will charge
you for 15 PCs; if tomorrow you decide you need just five,
you give the ten back, I charge you for five, and I'll use
the ten for somebody else," he says. The charges are taken
from the units' revenues, which all go to Leong's centralized
treasury.
The logic behind this model is for the
business units to function like independent companies without
having to worry about their back-end needs. But the more important
reason is competitive advantage. The supply chain industry
is riddled with players both big and small. In the US, for
example, Li & Fung is the leader in its industry, even though
it holds just 5 percent of the market. It has acquired or
merged with a number of competitors, and it hopes to cannibalize
both sides of the competitive spectrum. "We're marrying the
strength of being small and big together," says Leong. "Big
companies tend to get bureaucratic, while small companies
can do specialized products. Our small business units act
extremely fast, but at the back-end, they get the level of
service of a huge company," he says.
Aside from IT, the OSG also acts as an
in-house HR provider, offering recruitment services, internal
matching of staff and training. Equally impressive, Leong
acts as the chief banker of these units. Because all revenues
go to Leong in US dollars, he is able to support business
units by pooling their cash balances. "They can borrow from
us, and the rate we charge is cheaper than if they go outside,"
says Leong. When necessary, Li & Fung also provides trade
financing to its clients. "If the customer wants us to do
it, they will open an L/C (letter of credit) to us, and we
will open an L/C to the vendors wherever they are," he says.
As with anyone who runs a business, Leong's
performance is measured against his own P&L. "I am subject
to scrutiny, which is why the system is quite good. If my
technology is far behind, I get a complaint. If I spend a
lot of money, I would have to charge higher - which my internal
customers don't want - or else I face a loss," he says. As
such, while mindful of the cost of OSG in a micro view, Leong
is actually managing the cost of the entire business.
To be sure, Li & Fung reached its maturity
through acquisitions. In 1995, the Australian sourcing company
Dodwell, where Leong was finance director, broadened Li &
Fung's client base in Europe, and expanded its sourcing network
beyond east Asia to include south Asia, the Mediterranean
and the Caribbean. The acquisition of two Hong Kong competitors,
Camberley and Swire & Maclaine in 1999, gave it the design
process expertise, and clients such as Laura Ashley and Ann
Taylor. Last year, the merger with Colby, a California supply
chain manager catering to US department stores, consolidated
Li & Fung's market leadership position.
In each case, Leong was able to leverage
the scale of his IT operations. Colby, for example, had budgeted
up to US$10 million to upgrade its IT systems before the merger.
"After we merged, they got the upgraded IT system, but we
only spent a few million Hong Kong dollars to increase the
capacity of our systems," says Leong. "Because of the scalability
of our systems, and our ability to customize according to
Colby's needs, we were able to achieve economies of scale.
Our major cost is actually people," he says.
As its asset-to-sales ratio proves, the
Li & Fung model is working almost flawlessly. And what of
shareholder value? Li & Fung is so cash-rich that every year
it divvies up 70 to 80 percent of its earnings among shareholders.
Currently, it has US$300 million cash in deposits. This Leong
doesn't mind, given that some of Li & Fung's ventures are
not asset-heavy. But they are positioned for "prospective
acquisitions," he says. A recent strategic partnership with
the Japanese supply chain integrator Nichimen only cost him
US$4 million in purchases of Nichimen's clothing stock. The
partnership is a tiny cross-shareholding structure, the payment
a symbolic exercise. Still, it will put Li & Fung on the map
in fashion-crazy Japan.
Like Zinc for Chocolate
IWhile geographic diversification has
been Li & Fung's approach to expansion, Noble Group's has
been through its products. Noble started with metals, and
through acquisitions ventured into sugar, grains, coal, and
last year, cocoa. "Commodities are cyclical. At the same time
we went into grain, some of our other businesses were going
flat and we didn't see that there was a potential growth cycle
going forward," says Sullivan.
Noble's value proposition is similar to
Li & Fung's. For example, instead of buying cocoa from farmers
and selling them in the same form to cocoa distributors, Noble
gets involved in processing the cocoa seeds into a form marketable
directly to chocolate manufacturers. To reduce the risk exposure,
cocoa seeds bought from farmers in the Ivory Coast are washed,
peeled and warehoused in the same country before they are
shipped, says Noble's group financial controller Louis Tang.
Sullivan adds: "We're supplying producers with material, we're
providing credit, we're providing logistical support. If you
look at the way Li & Fung is involved in each stage of their
business - from sourcing to shipping to storing to distrubution
to sale - it's parallel."
True enough, Noble has structured its
organization somewhat like Li & Fung. The support services
- finance, logistics and technology - are distinct and separate
from the core activities of trading in agriculture (cocoa,
sugar, wheat, corn, soybean, rice and pulses), energy (coal
and coke), and metals and ores (alloys, manganese, zinc and
nickel), which account for much of the group's revenues.
Given this structure, which was adopted
when Sullivan and Tang joined the company in 2001, Noble becomes
a one-stop-shop for its customers and suppliers. This includes
Noble Trade Finance, which offers them insurance products
and hedging strategies, and of which Sullivan is managing
director. "In commodities, you buy goods, store them, ship
them, store them again and sell them. We need a lot of structured
finance, and banks in Asia are not very good at this," he
says. Unlike traditional commodities traders, Noble does not
take positions for gains in commodities exchanges. "We're
a physical business, not a derivatives business, so we know
who we're going to sell to," says Sullivan.
Because margins in commodities trading
are razor thin (in grains, says Sullivan, it's all of 1 percent),
Noble pursues an active risk management strategy. "If you're
buying grain in the world market, you will buy at world prices,
and if you're selling in Indonesia, the local price has completely
different fundamentals," he explains. If the local price at
any period of time is much higher than the world price, hedging
is less imperative, he says. "But if you know there is a chance
the local price will fall below world prices, then you need
to hedge to protect your prices," Sullivan adds.
Noble also provides logistics support
by arranging shipping, either with any of the three ships
it owns, or from other shipping companies. In the latter case,
Noble pursues a hedging strategy by buying routes or freight
space in advance, and trading them in the dedicated exchanges,
says Tang. But what differs Noble from Li & Fung is that Noble
takes these support services one step further by extending
their capabilities for external customers. For example, Sullivan
sells political and credit risk insurance and structured finance
products to other traders.
The ship management business is also one
of its most profitable. "This is probably one of our most
asset-light businesses, because it only involves people,"
says Tang. Noble has a database of 2,000 shipping crew - people
who manage ships from supply provision to technical troubles
- it can use when it takes on shipping management contracts
from ship owners. "We actually own the three ships just to
prove that we have expertise in ship management," says Tang.
Acquisition Mode
Another difference is that Noble is preparing
itself to add fixed assets to its balance sheet. Currently
in its metals and ores business, Noble is trying to widen
its margins by taking equity stakes in several small mines
in Australia, and soon, Indonesia. Noble's strategy is to
forge partnerships with entrepreneurs who have the cash to
buy mines from the government. "We're taking these strategic
smaller stakes, and getting contracts to manage the mines
from the owners who don't want to manage them," says Sullivan.
By investing 20 to 30 percent equity stakes in the means of
production, Noble gets a guaranteed supply of product. "They
give us the management contract. We can arrange the financing
and the contractors," he says.
In its energy commodities business such
as oil and gas, Sullivan says Noble is also looking to become
a distributor itself, as opposed to a seller to distributors.
"You can trade oil, but do you get to the stage where you're
putting oil into cans and selling in a certain market? There
is huge scope to get closer to end-users. We've stopped selling
to traders who sell to distributors. We try more and more
to sell to distributors, but some of the distributors are
also retailers," says Sullivan. "So if we want to become a
distributor ourselves, maybe we also have to go into retailing
of certain commodities. I think there's huge potential for
that. I can see one day when we have petrol stations," he
says.
To remain asset-light, however, Sullivan
has a counterstrategy. Having been a banker for ten years
before joining Noble and establishing Noble Trade Finance,
Sullivan wants to expand the financial services business.
"We have a lot of expertise to increase the activity of financing
and insurance with our supply chain, and I think that is something
that doesn't burn your balance sheet," he says. Like Li &
Fung, Noble is still in an acquisition mode.
A good glimpse of where Noble and
Li & Fung are headed, however, happened during a taxi ride
that Sullivan shared with Noble CEO Richard Elman not too
long ago. In the backseat of a worn-down cab in downtown Manhattan,
Elman was talking with Sullivan about his ambitions. Elman
came to New York in search of opportunities to expand, or
finance the expansion, of his company. As the taxi careened
to Fifth Avenue, Elman was piqued by the shiny, curvy logo
of a shop guarded by an army of masculine mannequins in dark
woolen pinstripes. He paused briefly, then turned and threw
a question to Sullivan. "Do you know who might one day buy
Brooks Brothers?" asked Elman. Sullivan sat in silence. "Probably
Li & Fung," Elman said. Sullivan then snapped with a grin.
"I thought you were going to say Noble."
Abe De Ramos is a senior writer for
CFO Asia based in Hong Kong.
|
OUTSOURCING - The Bearable
Lightness of Assets
Personal satisfaction rewarded by a greater
involvement in business strategy is just one of the benefits
to the CFO of an asset-light business model. Arguably, CFOs
in the US are enjoying this distinction, having pioneered
virtual manufacturing by outsourcing the production of their
goods Ñ from vacuum cleaners to silicon chips Ñ
to Asian factories. "I like the outsourcing model very
much because it makes my job a lot easier," says Marcel
Gani, CFO of US-based Juniper Networks, the only credible
competitor to Cisco Systems in the global market for Internet
networking equipment, such as routers. "However, it is
still critical that I work with contract manufacturers to
manage the cost side of the equation," he says. Gani,
not surprisingly, has a lot in common with Frank Leong of
Li & Fung. He has direct oversight of human resources
and information technology, both its internal communications
systems and the on-line ordering system with customers.
For Gani, one quantifiable benefit of
being asset-light came in the third quarter of its financial
year ending January. In October, Juniper took a US$30 million
charge to pay its North American contract manufacturers, largely
Solectron and Celestica, for inventory they could no longer
absorb due to the economic downturn. That amount, Gani estimates,
could have been at least three times as high if Juniper carried
its own inventory. "The beauty of the virtual manufacturing
model is that we are able to mitigate the amount of exposure
significantly by working with the contract manufacturer, by
taking advantage of the fact that they have more leverage
on suppliers, and they have alternative uses for the materials,"
he says.
CFOs on this side of the world are catching
on. Neptune Orient Lines (NOL), for example, is going in the
asset-light direction. NOL is focusing its investment strategy
less on ships and more on logistics and supply chain management.
Its CFO, Lim How Teck, is also its deputy CEO.
Lim, who has acquired two logistics companies
in the last three years, is a fan of asset-light acquisitions
if only for the accounting regulations that support them.
Although goodwill can account for the lion's share of the
valuation of an asset-light business, CFOs do not have to
immediately amortize it, as they do with fixed assets. As
such, its impact on earnings is milder. "If you buy a
US$100 million asset and you have US$80 million in goodwill,
in the old days this US$80 million is to be written off over
20 years, which is quite a pain to the bottom line,"
says Lim. "But nowadays, you just have to do a theoretical
impairment test on the US$80 million to see whether it has
shrunk. If US$80 million is still there, then you don't amortize
anything at all to the P&L," he says.
Another example is Foster's Group, the
US$4 billion-a-year Australian brewer. The company has more
or less given up on its ambition to become the number-one
beer brand in the world. So in late 2000, it acquired Beringer,
an American premium wine maker that does not make its own
wine: it outsources the process. Foster's has found that in
wine, there is not only truth, but also future. Beringer propelled
Foster's earnings by 20 percent to US$322 million in the first
half of the 2002 fiscal year. Trevor O'Hoy, CFO of Foster's,
has four areas of responsibility in both wine and beer: general
finance such as accounting, treasury and tax; group strategy;
fundraising through the capital markets; and group logistics.
Do-It-All
Having multi-dimensional roles is not
just a by-product of having too much time on one's hands.
To these CFOs, holding different responsibilities is about
creating shareholder value and gaining competitive advantage.
Gani of Juniper, for example, is in charge of hiring engineers
who can design better routers, which is their main defense
against the virtual monopoly of Cisco. O'Hoy of Foster's,
on the other hand, believes that CFOs begin to expand their
roles in the business by actively enforcing the financial
targets their company has set to begin with.
"Our business strategy is driven
by our financial strategy, so it's important that the finance
person is heavily involved," says O'Hoy. His financial
strategy is closely guarded, even cut in stone: to deliver
double-digit bottom line growth every year; to continually
increase the spread of return on investment over his weighted
average cost of capital (it should be at least 500 basis points
over WACC); and to run the company within a lofty BBB+ credit
rating.
As such, O'Hoy sets his footprints on
every acquisition Foster's makes. "Clearly one of the
roles of the new CFO going forward is to try and convert dreams
and ideas into commercial reality. We have a lot of people
thinking about supply chain planning but very few of them
have the ability to actually convert them from an idea to
a commercial, robust business model," he says. By O'Hoy's
valuation, Beringer's wine outsourcing business model is what
would make Foster's meet his strict criteria.
"Beringer was the first in our list
of three [acquisition] targets because they are leaders in
the outsourcing model, which I think is the best way to improve
your return on investment," he says.
Ultimately, O'Hoy expects to see Foster's
share price move from what he calls a beer multiple Ñ
currently 16 times P/E ratio, which is thinly in line with
other beer companies Ñ into a wine multiple of about
22 to 24 times P/E. "A CFO shouldn't pretend to understand
a business model that well, but where we influence it is in
the way business models should be designed: by financial discipline,"
he says.
ADR |