| TREASURY AND RISK MANAGEMENT |
November
2001 |
TIME BANDITS
As business tightens, companies are
trying to preserve cash by delaying payment.
By Jasper Moiseiwitsch
In bad times, bill collection suddenly
leaps from back-office job to front-office headache. In Asia,
where cross-border trade is the lifeblood of tens of thousands
of companies, it's no surprise that accounts receivables are
swelling. With Singapore, Japan and Taiwan already in recession,
the threat of defaults is rising. The Hong Kong collection
agency Frontline Business Information, for example, reports
a 40 percent increase in debt-recovery inquiries since January.
It also says that 40 percent of businesses contacted in the
past six months have experienced payment delays. Worse, 70
percent of SMEs in Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
Thailand and Korea are now rated as high credit risk, according
to the agency.
Defaults and payment-delay issues have
been made worse by a regional trend towards unsecured, open-account
type transactions. Large US and European buyers - particularly
in the electronics and chemicals sectors - are insisting that
their Asian suppliers sell goods on open-account terms, instead
of using guarantees like letters of credit (LCs). The reason
is plain to see. Jeremy Hampshire, director of trade credit
in Asia for insurance brokerage Aon Risk Services says: "In
North America and Europe buyers are saying, 'We don't want
to have the extra cost [of payment guarantees].' They say,
'If I'm buying from Asia we'll insist on open-account - and
if you don't like that then we'll source our goods somewhere
else.'" The result: the slow demise of the letter of credit.
Another casualty has been the move to
electronic trading systems, announced with much fanfare over
the past few years. An all-electronic system wrings significant
costs out of the labor-intensive business of trade finance.
But more and more players are reluctant to take the plunge
as the economic climate chills (see box, below).
The problem is not so much the cost of
the new technology. It's more that a one-click system demands
one-click payment. Says a CFO who wishes to remain nameless:
"Some companies are resisting electronic systems because they
want to keep full control over payment. If everything goes
smoothly (document processing and invoicing) they lose an
important excuse to pay on time."
Cracking the Rice Bowl
In China, payment collection is complicated
further. Its entry to the World Trade Organization (WTO) will
accelerate its already muscular growth in international trade.
Not surprisingly, Asian manufacturers
are shifting production to the mainland. Taiwan's computer
sector is all but decamping to China, with its semiconductor
industry not far behind. And as WTO eliminates China's export
quotas in textiles, the region's garment manufacturers are
also expected to move north.
Suppliers to these industries are watching
the shift with trepidation, as China's trade finance remains
in the dark ages. Small local firms are notorious for delaying
payment, and the mainland banks offer few solutions. "In China
the trade finance market is very difficult. They don't have
local LCs. A lot of trade is done via open account, with very
long trade terms," says Nikson Ma, the Hong Kong-based group
treasury director for Astec International, a manufacturer
of power converters.
Astec sells transformers to mainland buyers,
who in turn make computer components for large US-based PC
manufacturers such as Dell. As Dell stands as the ultimate
buyer for the finished goods and is fully creditworthy, Ma's
Chinese buyers insist Astec deal with them on open account
terms. Unfortunately, these partners tend to delay their payments,
usually by weeks but sometimes for months.
"The question is, what is the customer
profile? For Dell or IBM, I don't care much. First, I don't
perceive much credit risk. Second, they are relatively punctual,"
says Ma. "What I'm concerned with is the subcontractors, those
two-dollar (thinly capitalized) companies because they are
usually late and their credit risk is high," he says. Ma says
there is little he can do to protect himself in these transactions,
apart from seeking some form of payment guarantee from the
ultimate buyer - an extreme action that does not solve the
main problem of payment delays.
Unfortunately for Ma, international banks
are not allowed to have a renminbi relationship with mainland
companies, so cannot issue letters of credit on the companies'
behalf. The local banks can cover these transactions, but
are only beginning to enter this market.
Stuart Tait, HSBC's senior manager of
trade services based in Hong Kong say this of his institution's
mainland rivals: "The Chinese banks have come a long way (in
their trade finance services). The big four Chinese banks'
reputations are much stronger than four years ago but they
remain massive bureaucracies. It's quite difficult to get
to the core of an issue when talking with such monoliths."
CFOs indeed complain about the quality
of coverage for their China transactions, implicating both
China's banks and the wayward payment methods of some of their
mainland partners. Says Astec's Ma: "We are asking [the mainland
banks] if they are willing to purchase the [renminbi] accounts
receivables. But this is quite a new concept to China's bankers.
We are waiting for China's banks or other institutions to
come up with more innovative products."
It all makes trade with China tremendously
complicated. Frank Lai, the CFO of Hong Kong-based Central
Semiconductor Manufacturing (CSM), uses some cumbersome methods
to manage his mainland transactions. "In China there is very
limited imagination with regards to financing. We prefer to
use letters of credit," says Lai. "But our buyers in China,
even some of the big clients, usually offer post-dated checks.
Sometimes we ask our clients for collateral - for example,
property." Lai says that if CSM has an open account, he will
ask for collateral for any transaction above a certain limit.
Now or Whenever
The rise of China trade and the move to
open accounts both point to the single-most important trade-finance
issue on CFOs' minds: getting paid, on time. Open accounts
have done the most to undermine timely settlement. In a karmic
working-out of the great corporate credit swap, CFOs have
seen everyone delay payment to everyone.
Ma of Astec describes a lugubrious waltz
between partners down the supply chain, in which all are deferring
settlement. "We are all chasing the same set of money. It's
difficult to control," says Ma. "If they are big buyers and
they delay payment for ten days, so what? Am I going to take
them to court?" Ma says that Astec sometimes offers incentives,
in the form of a discount, so that buyers settle their invoices
quickly. "It's actually quite silly," says Ma. "You offer
a discount just so people pay on time."
More and more, CFOs are turning to banks
to help them with their cashflow. Nowadays, for example, finance
managers are more likely to ask their banks for loans to manage
a large order or to buy their accounts receivables than to
worry about setting up letters of credit.
The banks are happy to oblige as this
is where they find their profits. "The banks make most of
their money in trade finance from fees and interest income,"
says Abraham Chacko, senior vice-president of ABN Amro in
Singapore. "For example, Asian suppliers to global companies
would generally be interested in pre- and post-shipment financing
and a quick collection cycle," he says.
Help is also at hand from another quarter:
trade insurance. CFOs are increasingly looking at this means
of payment coverage, which is common in Europe but is just
starting to take hold in Asia. Paris-based Coface, the world's
largest export credit insurer, is expanding aggressively in
Asia. The group has also rolled out an Internet service, its
so-called @rating Solution.
The service has much in common with other
web-based trade finance offerings - on-line distribution,
an indifferent approach to the capitalization of proper nouns
- but distinguishes itself in its scope. The service guarantees
payment on goods shipped to about 70,000 firms for which it
maintains a rating, ratings that are in turn culled from a
database detailing about 35 million companies.
Generally CFOs find insurance a useful
substitute for transactions that can't be covered by letters
of credit (that is, most of their mainland dealings) or when
trading with smaller firms that are unknown by the banks.
Aon's Hampshire says most of his clients look for coverage
on their small-company transactions.
The China market - where companies are
less likely to be publicly listed and where disclosure standards
are low - stands most in need of the credit insurer's special
brand of risk management. "There is very limited credit information
about [China's] small- to medium-sized enterprises. We have
noted that a company can expand very fast and then contract
very fast in China," says Lai of Central Semiconductor Manufacturing,
which uses a mix of LCs and export insurance.
It all speaks of risk. In the fourth
quarter of 2001, that great sucking sound is the dollars drained
by companies' collective accounts receivable. Money delayed
is money lost and money at peril.
Jasper Moiseiwitsch is a freelance writer
for CFO Asia based in Hong Kong |