| CORPORATE FINANCE |
June 2001 |
SEIZE THE DAY
CFOs need a sharp eye - and an appetite
for risk - if they want to grab opportunities.
By Lotte Chow and Steven Crane
Boundless risk must pay for boundless
gain." The British poet William Morris wrote those words
more than a century ago, but they still ring true today. The
current corporate landscape in Asia shows companies hesitating
between expansion and stagnation or retrenchment and disaster.
The outlook for the world economy remains blurred and good
prospects are still scattered. To be successful, CFOs need
to jump on an opportunity and take the risks that go with
it.
Take Chua Sock Koong. Since March, the CFO of Singapore government-owned
telecoms provider SingTel has been on the defensive, parrying
accusations that she is overpaying for a pending US$7 billion
acquisition of the Australian mobile phone company Cable &
Wireless Optus. Her critics are wrong, she says. "People
say that we overpaid but the control premium we'll pay is
a fair price. This deal gives us scope and scale. We can't
let short-term reactions distract our objectives."
That reaction was a stampede out of the stock by SingTel shareholders,
pulling the share price down by 26 percent just days after
the deal was announced. She attributes the drop to the technical
structure of the deal, which gave punters a once-in-a-lifetime
opportunity. But the shares have not recovered, and analysts
bet it will stay humbled for a while. The investment is too
risky, they say, for a company that is accustomed to state
control. Australia is a mature telecom market; SingTel can
only grow there by offering services it has little experience
in, such as broadband and third generation mobile.
These will be costly investments,
requiring nearly US$1 billion over the next 12 months alone,
says John Barrett, a telecom analyst at Pyramid Research,
part of The Economist Group. And to Chua, this means scaling
down SingTel's cash pile, and even borrowing from the international
bond markets - something it has never had a need to do. "Essentially,
it's a double or nothing bet. There's great risk, but if successful,
they'll reap double the benefits," Barrett says. Clearly,
Chua has those rewards in her sights.
Chua's compatriot David Eaw, group CFO at SembCorp Industries
(SCI), is in a similar state. Since 1998, Eaw has been helping
the diversified company focus on its core businesses - ranging
from marine engineering to information technology. His strategy
includes expanding through acquisitions or alliances in the
West.
Eaw's growth targets are ambitious. In the next two years,
the CFO figures he must invest US$962 million to support his
goal to triple turnover at SembCorp to US$7 billion by 2006.
It's easy to set targets, but delivery is another matter.
In March, SCI cancelled a US$165 million share placement to
help his spending power, "due to poor market conditions,"
he says. However, Eaw is now looking at a convertible or straight
bond issue. "Our expansion targets are not without basis,"
Eaw insists. "Whatever the market reaction, you're damned
if you do and damned if you don't. We've set the roadmap and
we're very much on track."
Seek and Some Shall Find
There is one factor working in favor of Chua, Eaw,
and other CFOs who are prepared to hunt for funds in a difficult
market. The expected economic downturn may be shutting off
equity markets, but the Federal Reserve's successive interest
rate cuts are making it cheaper to borrow funds. Act fast
enough, and a CFO can do wonders to his balance sheet. "Because
US dollar interest rates are at pretty attractive levels right
now, we will see some issuers using the favorable environment
as an opportunity to get good long-term financing," says
Richard Stoddard, director and head of debt capital markets
at Merrill Lynch in Hong Kong.
In fact, a number of CFOs have already acted. Hong Kong Land,
for example, completed its first international bond issue
in April. Hong Kong's subway operator Mass Transit Railway
Corp (MTRC) launched a US$2 billion bond program, while Hong
Kong-based conglomerate Hutchison Whampoa also grabbed a US$1.5
billion debt deal at a cheap 187 basis points above US treasuries.
Soon, Korean provider SK Telecom will follow, as will China
conglomerate Citic Pacific.
But judging from the names above, one can tell that not everyone
is invited. "Good, strong investment grade credits will
continue to outperform high-yield Asian credits, and investors
will probably end up focusing more on the investment grade
paper than on the sub-investment grade paper," says Stoddard.
That's good news for SingTel, whose CEO Lee Hsien Yang thinks
the company should get at least a double-A credit rating.
But it's bad news for, say, its Philippine joint venture Globe
Telecom.
The same is true of the equity markets. "It has been
much harder to attract capital in the last six months,"
says Jim Hildebrandt, managing director for consulting firm
Bain & Company in Hong Kong. "In the current market
environment, straight equity deals are few and far between,"
adds Deutsche Bank Asia Pacific corporate finance head, Philip
Crotty.
This attitude is in stark contrast to just 18 months ago,
when rocketing share prices, bullish investor sentiment, and
an influx of private equity funds were fuelling the corporate
finance scene in much of Asia. This is due not just to the
change in economic environment but to something more noteworthy
to the capital-searching CFO. Aside from the global meltdown,
one reason investors are more selective when it comes to Asian
companies is a plain and simple reality check.
The burst of the high-tech bubble, as well as the spectacular
default of Asia Pulp and Paper, one of the largest debt issuers
among emerging markets, were both painful blows to investors
and bankers whose trust in fundamentals were blinded by zeal.
Nowadays, most would rather hear the words "long history
of profits" and "low gearing" than they would
"high growth potential". "You need to be in
the right sectors to attract capital these days," says
Johnson Cheung, analyst at financial advisory firm Global
Chinese Research in Hong Kong.
Right Place, Right Time
That worked for Simon Kong. A few months
ago, while pricing the IPO of his company Global Bio-Chem,
Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index plunged 500 points. Kong, executive
director for finance at the Hong Kong-based company, frantically
called his colleagues. "Do you think investor sentiment
will come around?" he asked. On the next day, the index
slumped another 300 points.
Kong held his nerve. Launched on the 16th
of March, the IPO was three times over-subscribed, raising
US$39 million as targeted. Kong can now build a new production
plant, beef up the company's sales and distribution network
and repay some bank loans. "We were very pleased, considering
the extremely volatile market conditions," says Kong.
The biochemical field, which applies sophisticated technology
to convert natural materials into products such as fuel additives,
is one of the hottest industries in the world, Cheung says.
That's partly why investors snapped up Global Bio-Chem shares.
In contrast, two China-based companies that tried to list
in Singapore - People's Food Holdings and United Food Holdings
- were under-subscribed during their first quarter listings.
They have since seen their shares drift. Analysts blamed,
among other things, the companies' lack of differentiation
in the food sector for their performance.
Other crucial factors that worked in Global Bio-Chem's favor,
according to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, which sponsored the
deal, are its market niche and earnings record. With two production
plants in China, the seven-year-old, US$168 million-a-year
company makes corn-based biochemical products, which are used
in feed stocks and food additives. The company is the leading
manufacturer of refined corn products in China, with 90 percent
of its output sold in the mainland. As China is one of the
world's largest and fastest growing users of corn-based biochemical
goods, Global Bio-Chem's growth potential is strong. The company
improved profits to US$29.5 million on sales of US$154 million
in 2000, from US$1.8 million on sales of US$128 million in
1997.
On a Clear Day
For finance managers in less attractive industries, there
are other ways to attract investors' attention. Investors
are beginning to looking beyond balance sheets and into more
subjective criteria such as transparency and good governance.
Increasingly, this is something a CFO must offer to be able
to grab attention. To serve this growing demand for transparency,
Standard & Poor's (S&P), the global credit rating
agency, is forming a corporate governance rating system for
Asian corporates. Says John Bailey, director at S&P in
Hong Kong: "Because of the economic jitters and the risks
corporates are now facing, investors are increasingly focused
on governance issues on the offering documents, especially
among high yield credits. For investment grade credits, especially
in Hong Kong, there is a lot of liquidity out there."
To illustrate, investment bankers are practically begging
the Hong Kong government to increase the allotment for institutional
investors for the first share placement of the Mass Transit
Railway Corp (MTRC) since its IPO last year. The share offer
is expected in the second half of 2001. MTRC earned US$513
million in net profits last year, almost double from 1999.
It is also well regarded in financial circles for its transparency,
says Edward Chow, head of the corporate governance committee
at the Hong Kong Society of Accountants.
The Urge to Merge
Failing to achieve transparency
and credit-worthiness requirements, finance managers had better
look harder for cash. And true enough, bankers say many companies
are reassessing and scaling down fund raising plans. To be
sure, many are still itching to sell shares and bonds, or
borrow from banks, to raise funds.
"Merger and acquisition activity has declined, but many
deals are still in progress and will need capital to complete,"
says Michael Berchtold, managing director at investment bank
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter in Hong Kong. "Increasingly
we are seeing companies looking to sell subsidiary assets,
freeing up funds that will be channeled into core business
areas," he says. "
Others are looking to merge with
or acquire businesses in the region to increase scale and
enhance their competitive position," he adds. "Although
overall M&A deal volume is down, the number of larger
and more complex domestic and cross-border mandates is going
up, requiring companies to seek banks for advice. The catalyst
is the region's growing focus on shareholder value."
Not surprisingly, deals are not
just fewer, but also smaller. During the first quarter of
the year, for example, equity issuance in Asia dropped 37
percent to US$12 billion from a year earlier, according to
US-based Thomson Financial, which compiles capital market
deals globally. Asian loan deals fell to 43, worth US$13.4
billion, in the first quarter of 2001, from 77 deals, worth
US$25.1 billion, in the same period last year. International
bond deals, including government issues, were more stable
at 12 deals worth US$5 billion from 19 deals worth US$5.7
billion.
Aim Low
With investors' pockets getting deeper, CFOs and bankers should
look for ways to increase the attractiveness of an issue -
even if it means scaling down the fund raising goals. To accommodate
the less-than-favorable market sentiment, Kong of Global Bio-Chem
says he priced the offer at the low end of market expectations
of HK$1.02 a share, giving the company a price-to-earnings
ratio of four times.
The conservative pricing made Global Bio-Chem a few notches
cheaper than other China plays and bio-chem stocks. Kong also
lined up US-based food trader Cargill to buy a stake in the
share issue, a move that helped boost investor interest in
the company.
Bankers, for their part, are reasonably optimistic that the
flow of funds into Asia will soon swell when investors realize
that asset prices have bottomed. "We believe that the
environment for equity issues will improve in the second half
of the year as the combination of cheaper valuations, falling
interest rates and more clarity on earnings provide the necessary
foundations in the underlying market. Once these factors are
in place, people will take a more positive view on primary
market issues," says HSBC equity capital markets director
for Asia, Colin Milton.
Until then, CFOs are proceeding with caution when it comes
to expansion or merger plans. And with capital likely to remain
selectively generous for some time, CFOs will need a sharper
eye for opportunities and be willing, like SingTel's Chua,
to take some risks. 
Lotte Chow is contributing editor and Steven
Crane is executive editor at CFO Asia. Additional reporting
by Abe De Ramos. |
Restructuring
Debt Survivors
While many companies in China, Taiwan,
Hong Kong, Singapore and South Korea are trying to find ways
to raise capital, many of their counterparts in Thailand,
Malaysia and Indonesia are still trying hard to pay down their
debt.
Three-and-a-half years after the regional
financial crisis, many companies in Southeast Asia are still
restructuring their businesses to strengthen their balance
sheets. A majority have sold or shut their non-core and non-profitable
units to raise funds, while others have negotiated with scores
of creditors to extend their loan repayment period.
"Before, a company might have five
to eight businesses; now, they are selling three to five to
focus on their core two to three businesses," says Jeff
Pirie, a Singapore-based partner of US consultancy Andersen.
"Their goal is to refocus their portfolios."
"There's a lot of restructuring going
on in Thailand and Indonesia. Major companies, for example,
are using the domestic capital markets to refinance their
existing debt," says Deutsche Bank corporate finance
head for Asia Pacific Philip Crotty.
For a good example, look no further than
Thailand's Siam City Cement. Once one of the country's most
heavily indebted companies, Siam now owes creditors just US$110
million - a far cry from the US$542 million it owed at the
end of 1997. Its sales and profits last year were US$322 million
and US$21 million respectively.
Described by its peers as a model for
Thailand's debt restructuring effort, Siam City Cement sold
US$917 million worth of non-core assets by 2000, among them
its sanitary goods, electric products and packaging units,
to raise cash. It also sold a 25 percent stake to Swiss cement
maker Holderbank in exchange for funding and management assistance
to help revitalize the company.
"We'll be able to pay off our debt
by next year," claims Siam City Cement's secretary general
Staporn Phettongkam from Bangkok. "We'll continue to
consolidate our business to focus on the core and profitable
businesses."
Lotte
Chow |
LBOs
When the Rubber Hits the Road
Call it a bright spot in a dry market.
UBS Capital's March US$55 million acquisition of Singapore-based
Sime Diamond Leasing from the Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi is
the only leveraged buyout (LBO) by a financial sponsor in
Asia so far this year.
Although a small deal, the protagonists
make it interesting. Diamond, which primarily leases cars,
was held 40 percent by Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi and 30 percent
apiece by Sime Singapore, the Singapore unit of the Malaysian
conglomerate, and Diamond Leasing. Operating in the sweet
spot of a traditionally low margin market, Diamond has managed
to grow its profits faster than its revenues - at 27 percent
per year compared to 17 percent - over the 16 years since
the business was started. Profits for the 2000 fiscal year
ended in June were S$13 million (US$7 million) on revenues
of S$31 million (US$17 million). Nevertheless, Mitsubishi
wanted the company off its balance sheet, because the ailing
bank needed to demonstrate to its shareholders that it had
the will to shed non-core assets. The troubled bank also needed
cash.
David Lai, president of UBS Capital in
Singapore, says he was initially intrigued by Diamond, but
wary. On the face of it, leasing businesses are less attractive
when they're not owned by banks. Not being financial institutions,
they must manage a higher cost of funding than banks. Also,
deadbeats and people who run off with cars are a big liability.
But special conditions in Singapore made the deal look attractive.
There are few car thiefs in the iron-fisted Lion City - Diamond's
loss rate is less than 1 percent. Singapore's curious way
of regulating the car industry also worked in Diamond's favor.
Car prices are extremely high because they're subject to a
high import tax (including an additional registration fee
of 175 percent of the value of the new car). But the system
also features rebates to buyers if they sell in less than
ten years. The net effect is that Singapore's regulatory structure
makes for stronger and more predictable collateral.
But the true novelty of the deal is that
it is a leveraged recapitalization with a clever twist. Leverage
recaps are typically a feature that crop up during a hostile
bid. The target company borrows against its balance sheet
and distributes a special dividend to shareholders, simultaneously
driving the share price down (making the company less attractive
to suitors) and keeping current owners satisfied.
But Diamond was not a public company
and the deal was not hostile. The technique came in handy
here, for vastly different reasons. UBS Capital paid cash
for Diamond, then leveraged the balance sheet via loans from
a syndicate of Singapore banks. It then distributed the special
dividends to itself, which it used to replace the cash it
invested in the company. The loans reduced UBS Capital's net
equity position in Diamond and therefore lowered its cost
of capital for the deal. "It was the logical thing to
do," says Lai, "because Diamond's balance sheet
was strong, and only had a gearing level of two to one. We
brought it up to four to one to complete the recap."
That's still well below the average gearing of six to one
for this industry, and leaves Diamond with plenty of mileage
to capitalize on in the future.
Tom
Leander |