|
POWER TO THE PEOPLE
Corporate websites can offer much
more than on-line annual reports, as many finance managers
are discovering.
By Elizabeth Fry
Jackson Tai may not have invented the
Internet, but he certainly has embraced it. As CFO and investor
relations head at Singapore's DBS Bank, Tai understands that
investors want timely and relevant information and they want
it on-line. A click on the dedicated investor relations section
at dbs.com.sg offers the basics - annual reports, interim
results and board announcements. It also offers share price
performance, credit ratings from S&P, Moody's and Fitch,
as well as reports on corporate governance, risk management
and even the operations of the bank's back office functions.
As Tai knows, the rise of the global investor and the US push
for fair disclosure laws has made managing the flow of information
critical to attracting equity. And as promised, the Internet
is the great equalizer. "Investor relations," explains
Tai, "is about communicating equally with all stakeholders.
By directing the information, we can build a two-way market
on opinion."
In Asia, providing deeper and better service
to analysts, institutional and retail investors through on-line
investor relations (IR) is coming of age. In Hong Kong, 63
percent of major companies have a corporate website, and 83
percent in Singapore, according to a recent global survey
of web-based financial reporting by the International Accounting
Standards Committee (IASC).
The growing expertise and technological
know-how of international retail investors," says Singapore-based
Curtis Montgomery, CEO at on-line investment analyst firm
Wallstraits.com, is driving companies to respond to their
expectations. "On-line IR has a democratizing effect,"
says Montgomery. "Many analysts and fund managers in
the US fought against it. They wanted to be the filter that
took the information to the public, that is, their favorite
members of the public."
Finance executives, however, have a different agenda. Singapore
Airline's vice-president of finance, Ng Sim Hee, says the
company issues its latest financial information to the public
at the same time it is e-mailed to analysts. "Anyone
can get their hands on the data," says Ng. "There's
no discrimination between big or small investors."
Not every company, though, has embraced transparency or on-line
IR to that degree. Just 30 percent of Hong Kong companies
and 37 percent in Singapore provide the basic minimum of financial
information on-line, states the IASC, which surveyed the largest
companies in 22 countries. Only 20 percent of the sites in
both markets allowed downloading of HTML annual reports.
Why? For some finance executives,
an IR site is seen as too expensive or too risky. According
to those who know, however, it needn't be. While it's important
to be aware of the costs and potential pitfalls, analysts
agree that the web is a useful tool to build awareness, provide
a corporate focus on the issues a company considers important,
and build a loyal shareholder base. It's so effective, in
fact, that on-line IR may put some fund managers and analysts
out of business.
Clicking with Investors
In the meantime, the best analysts and fund managers had made
corporate website surfing their first order of business. Take
Singapore-based Lim Jit Soon, Salomon Smith Barney's head
of research. He spends about 30 percent of his time gathering
information on-line for the five companies he covers personally.
That said, Lim admits that increased transparency may have
a downside. "Simultaneous disclosure laws in the US (which
force companies to provide all investors with the same information
and are likely to be adopted in Singapore soon)," says
Lim, "will obviously make it more difficult for us to
anticipate events."
Or sell advice. For finance executives,
though, disclosure laws present a different sort of risk.
"The US law is certainly a driver," says Premod
Thomas, CFO at Singapore Technologies group, "and we're
very conscious that the website should be used as a tool for
full and simultaneous disclosure." But given that the
CFO's role is to minimize risk, not add to it, Thomas takes
great pains to ensure that information posted on the web is
accurate. That includes hypertext (links to other websites)
to analysts covering the stock.
In the US, hypertext can be especially hazardous, since the
Securities and Exchange Commission views links to analysts'
sites as the equivalent of the company directly transmitting
the information. While the regulations in Asia aren't yet
clear, CFOs need to be very careful that the site doesn't
endorse an analysts' work, which could trigger legal liabilities,
and that the analyst list is constantly updated so as not
to appear selective.
With that cautionary note in mind,
setting up the site is just a matter deciding of how many
bells and whistles you want and how much you can afford. For
Hong Kong-based Norris Leung, CFO at watch manufacturer Dailywin
Group, there was never any doubt that an on-line IR site would
boost the company's brand and reputation as an open and transparent
business. But Leung had neither the technology, the people
or the desire to spend the money on a fancy site - 1999 turnover
amounted just to HK$238 million (US$30.6 million). Instead,
he outsourced the job to a third-party web manager for a mere
HK$30,000 (US$3,800) a year.
By hiring third-party providers, especially high traffic financial
services hubs such as irasia, or Shareinvestor.com, smaller
companies can leverage their exposure. For example, at Wallstraits.com,
S$10,000 (US$5,800) a year buys the design and maintenance
of a corporate website. The package includes an IR section,
corporate write-ups and broadcasts to affiliate media such
as Yahoo and ChannelNews Asia, and even visits to your headquarters
from real investors.
Medium is the Message
CFOs with bigger ambitions and budgets are broadcasting "live
shows" through their IR sites. While the multi-media
equipment alone can cost at least US$80,000, Mohandas Pai,
CFO at Bangalore-based, Nasdaq-listed Infosys Technologies,
says spending on IR is a smart investment. Pai notes that
web communication is especially important for high-growth
technology companies, where timely disclosure can help stabilize
volatile share prices. It's equally important for companies
with a large US institutional following as a means of expanding
the company's shareholder base and building brand equity.
Unusually, for a finance head, Pai is directly involved in
all aspects of Infosys' web IR strategy - from the "look
and feel" of the pages to the content disclosed. Maximizing
the site's impact to keep investors interested is a job for
the CFO - not a web designer, he says. As a CFO, he knows
that communication is a two-way street, and by supervising
headlines, prioritizing information and eliciting feedback,
Pai can ensure that the site is effectively servicing shareholders.
Part of Pai's strategy is to personalize investor relations
through webcasting (delivering live or delayed audio or video
broadcasts over the web). With webcasting, Pai can reach his
international investor base simultaneously and meet US disclosure
requirements. What's more, investors can put a face to the
corporate machine. "Investors appreciate the live experience,"
says Pai. "Personal communication is the way of the future."
India isn't the only place where CFOs
are embracing the web. Kelvin Wong, Hong Kong-based head of
finance at Cosco Pacific, is a recent convert to the benefits
of communicating with stakeholders through on-line IR. The
company's site began by offering not much more than a corporate
profile and its annual report. But after consultations with
analysts and investors, he became convinced that offering
more information would pay off. "We had a lot of interest
in port performance in Hong Kong and mainland China,"
he says. "Shareholders asked, and we agreed, to provide
operational data each month on the web."
Still, as far as the web is concerned, Wong takes a conservative
approach. What matters most, he says, is the content and cost
effectiveness of the site, not state-of-the-art design and
technology. While he appreciates having investor comments
channeled via the web back to the company, he argues that
Asian companies and their US counterparts are at different
stages of sophistication and therefore have different requirements.
"US companies ... have been operating [under] a very
substantial disclosure regime for some time," he says,
"so the content and form of their presentation is of
equal importance."
Maybe so. But if CFOs have any doubts
about whether on-line IR can add value by communicating directly
with shareholders, they should note the case of Singapore
electronic contract manufacture, Sesdaq-listed Flairis Technology.
Last September CFO Tan Zing Yuen noticed that a research report
published by an on-line broker contained a glaring and very
worrying error. The broker noted that "2001 should be
a better year as [the company's] asset utilization improved
from as low as 25 percent to 80 percent."
Tan, along with company president and CEO, KY Wong, immediately
went live on the Net to correct the mistake - the all time
asset utilization low was 55 percent. It had never been as
low as 25 percent. Their swift action preempted market confusion
and negative reaction.
With this kind of capacity for immediate
response, effective on-line investor relations is an opportunity
CFOs can't afford to miss.
Elizabeth Fry is a contributing editor at
CFO Asia. |
Ground Zero
Whether you're starting from
scratch or improving an existing on-line IR site, consider
the following key questions:
What is your budget, both for internal and external resources?
Will the site be created, developed and managed, and internally?
Will some or all of the process be outsourced?
How will you measure the site's success?
It's fairly easy to get quantitative data of who's using your
site and when, but what are the best ways to stimulate qualitative
feedback?
What industry benchmarks are available to measure shareholder
use of the site?
Will you need legal advice on the site's content?
Who are the primary users and what do they want?
Will they use other sites for information on your company
and should you set up links with those?
Can you cross-promote current methods of reaching stakeholders
with your site?
What technology levels are appropriate to your users' expertise?
What are the "must haves" for your industry sector?
Do your competitors' sites meet their audience requirements?
If not, how can you improve on them?
Will your IR site be compatible with your company's overall
IT framework?
Can your server accommodate a large number of users simultaneously,
especially if you plan live webcasting?
Will your future information needs exceed your system's capacity?
Are links required with sister companies in your group?
Do you need to collaborate with IR colleagues overseas?
If so, how will you coordinate operations?
Is there a mechanism to coordinate IR with the finance, PR,
marketing, production and legal departments?
In responding to PR crises and opportunities, who makes the
decisions and speaks for the company?
How will their message be transmitted on-line to different
audiences?
| CORPORATE
BRANDING AND COMMUNICATION |
How will different departments work together in terms of access,
design and content?
What type of site best suits your company's business, i.e.,
high-tech, service industry, etc.?
How can you differentiate your site from competitors to win
investors' attention?
Can investors easily find your IR section?
How is the section organized so that various users can search
for information relevant to their needs, i.e., by date, subject,
product or source?
Source: Conosco and Addison Design Company
|