THE MAGAZINE FOR FINANCIAL DIRECTORS AND TREASURERS
  Home | Free email newsletter | Site map | Contact us 
 

CORPORATE FINANCE July/ August 2000

SAMURAI BONDING; DINERS' DELIGHT
CFOs seeking funds are looking to Japan; Securitization in Singapore
By Abe De Ramos

Alan Greenspan has made life rougher for CFOs in Asia. The US Federal Reserve Bank's recent interest rate hikes have narrowed the options for Asian companies seeking funds for working capital or to refinance existing debt. The solution, for more and more finance managers, has been to look east.

Indeed, Pohang Iron & Steel Co (Posco) of Korea chose the Japanese market for its first foreign bond issue in May. The reason was simple. "When I reviewed the Euro, Samurai and Yankee markets, Samurai was the best for the considerably low level of interest rate," says Hwang Tae-Hyun, finance director of the world's largest steelmaker.

Posco successfully raised 15 billion yen (US$142 million) from Japanese investors, paying a coupon of only 1.5 percent, or 92 basis points above Japanese government bonds.

In fact, low interest rates in Japan have even attracted blue-chip US and European issuers. In June, IBM raised 140 billion yen (US$1.32 billion) worth of Samurai bonds, the largest ever from a single corporate issuer. Xerox Credit and Alcatel preceded IBM, and next to join the fray are US-based Household Financial and Italian carmaker Fiat. The amount of Samurai bonds - yen-denominated bonds issued by non-Japanese entities - in the first six months of the year totaled 742 billion yen (US$7 billion), exceeding 660 billion yen (US$6.2 billion) raised in all of 1999.

Bankers say yen investors - in Japan or elsewhere - are only too willing to invest in instruments yielding better than the near-zero interest that Japanese government bonds pay. And while the flurry of new issues could make investors demand higher yields, bankers expect the Bank of Japan to maintain its zero-interest rate policy at least until the end of the year, as recovery in the Japanese economy is happening at a snail's pace.

"Japanese investors are looking for a certain kind of risk because the yield is higher," says Takashi Ueno, head of debt capital markets at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. Glenn Kim, who heads debt capital markets at Lehman Brothers in Hong Kong, adds that the Samurai market is also luring companies whose level of disclosure does not satisfy the stringent US generally accepted accounting principles.

The Samurai market, however, is not for everyone. Kim points out that Japanese investors are highly brand conscious - in bonds as well as clothes. A Samurai by an Asian issuer with a strong brand image would do well in the Japanese market, while those with a lower regional profile might not. Investors would also start to dig deeper into their pockets if the maturity went beyond three years, and the size beyond 30 billion yen.

Ueno says even investment-grade corporates with a negative outlook - typically due to deteriorating business conditions that could result in poorer credit - are on the bottom of Japanese investors' lists. "A single-A rating would be very easy to accept. Even though it has a downgrade outlook, there is an allowance. But some Japanese investors worry about a triple-B. [While] emerging markets for now are stable, [investors are not confident about] the future trends," Kim says.

Dining On Receivables

When Diners Club (Singapore) launched its credit card business last September, finance manager Peter Tam had no idea that new customers would account for 20 percent of the company's total client base within six months. Now Tam forecasts that this segment will make up more than half of Diners Club subscribers in the next three years. And as it grows, so does the need to fund the business.

Tam needed a funding structure that would not lock in Diners Club with a fixed amount of debt for a fixed period of time. He had to have room for more borrowings in line with the growth of the business. The answer came in the form of a revolving asset-backed securitization. It allows Diners Club to sell securities backed by credit card receivables on a monthly basis. The size may vary according to its working capital needs at that time. "With the growth in credit card base, we need a funding structure that would grow as our receivables grow. Securitization did just that," Tam says. ABN Amro Singapore managed the transaction.

Under the deal, Diners Club sells credit card receivables to a special purpose vehicle (SPV) it created. This SPV then issues 30-day certificates backed by the receivables to a unit of ABN Amro. This conduit in turn sells the certificates on the US commercial paper market. When the certificates mature, Diners Club has the option to issue another round of certificates, backed by another round of receivables. This option lasts three years. In the first tranche of S$44 million (US$25.9 million) in May, Tam says Diners Club paid an annual rate of 3.6 percent, a fraction of the annual 36 percent it normally charges credit card holders.

"Diners wanted a financing program that could be modified on a monthly basis. The easiest way to do that was to issue in the commercial paper market, because we can go in and increase the size later depending on their needs," says Gary Watmore, head of Asia Pacific Securitization at ABN Amro in Singapore.

They chose the US commercial paper market for its liquidity - it is the most liquid money market in the world. Singapore, by contrast, is just opening its doors for corporate bonds. Diners Club's Asian operation became the first company from the city-state to sell securities backed by anything other than rentals and mortgages. But Diners Club may be bringing more business to Singapore. The SPV it created also has a license to sell certificates to the Singapore market within the next three years. "I'm hoping the Singapore market will take off. Although we are not exposed to foreign exchange risk because of a currency swap, once I go into the Singapore market, I will not need to pay the market for that facility anymore," says Tam. ADR

LOCAL BOND MARKETS
Shangri-la dreaming

A US$500 million unsecured five-year loan by nine local banks to Shangri-la Hotels has Goldman Sachs' debt-markets analysts crying foul. Commercial banks, they claim, are stalling the growth of the local bond markets.

The Shangri-la loan will be used to refinance a convertible bond due in December 2000 and to bolster working capital. In more developed markets than Hong Kong, where the loan was extended by banks including HSBC, BNP Paribas and Societe Generale, companies would have typically turned to the bond market for refinancing, via a convertible or other type of bond, because of the lower cost of servicing debt. The price the Shangri-la negotiated was 68 basis points over Libor, very good terms for a sizable Asian credit, suggesting that bankers are bending over backwards to extend the loans. Posco, the South Korean steel giant, in contrast, went to the Samurai bond market to borrow US$100 million in June, and was only able to squeeze 72 basis points over Libor from its investment bankers (see related story, "Samurai Bonding").

Says Fan Jiang, head of Asian debt markets research for Goldman Sachs in Hong Kong: "The fact that Shangri-la didn't go to the convertible market to refinance is significant. It means it's more expensive to go to the capital markets. Someone must be wrong." He adds: "You can't have two risks, two rankings, for the identical borrower. Either the bond market is priced too high, or banks are taking on too much of the risk." Jiang's explanation is that local banks, flush with cash on their balance sheets, don't have enough places to put it, and are giving sweetheart deals to put their cash to work.

But are banks delving into a risky, pre-crisis style of behavior? Or is it that the Shangri-la loan has left investment banks like Goldman Sachs with a distinct aftertaste of sour grapes? Tom Leander